I watched the whole thing. It was good, but not great.
Stage production:
Very interesting, imaginative, but over-done IMO. Less would have been more. I liked the fact that the musicians were often on stage, among the actors in the crowd scenes. I hated the excessive dancing. Too many people dancing, for reasons that had little to do with the story line.. But that's just me - I'm not a fan of stage dancing in that way. The final act was stunning. Over-the-top, but very impressive.
Make-up and costumes:
Interesting (if over-done) approach, bringing the general theme down to modern day street-level - which is often a cop-out if you don't have the budget or the skills to do proper period costumes. It was over-done, IMO. And there were too many multi-tattooed, weird haircut types - they tried too hard to garner street creds, which actually lacked credibility.
Casting:
All very Hollywood and politically correct. (Female disciples?)
Music:
Very good. I appreciated the fact that in general, they kept the music (and the vocals, to the extent possible given the singers' capabilities) very close to the original recording, rather than putting their own spin on it. That would have ruined the whole thing. It was interesting to note that instead of staying 100% true to the recording, they included the (very) few verses that were in the original stage show, but were cut from the original recording. Similarly, I was glad that they included a song that was in the stage show but had to be cut from the recording. And I was relieved that they mostly managed to escape the horrific American trend of vocal embellishment and trills, again, keeping it close to the original.
JC:
John Legend was very good but far from great. Enunciated the wrong words, couldn't come close to Ian Gillan's range and fluffed it when he tried, and when he dropped a few octaves instead, he lost the emphasis needed. Still - it may be unfair to compare him (or anyone) to Gillan. But IMO, Legend wasn't well cast. I thought he lacked stage "presence", and the lighting and the camera angles were the only things that kept him in focus.
Mary:
Didn't have the musicality or the range of Yvonne Elliman (sp?) - but then again, Elliman's a hard act to follow. She was good, but not great.
Judas:
Excellent. I think the music producers misguided him in a few areas, but that guy is very good.
Pilate:
Fairly good.
Herod:
Good, but it was too staged as an "Alice Cooper hero-worship" event. Still, he did a good job,
Caiaphas:
Dunno who that guy was (I Googled him, but had never heard of him) - but he was excellent in that role.
General impression:
It was worth watching, and I think it was far better than any of the other big live stage productions that have been televised in recent years (Annie, Rocky Horror, etc.) On balance there were more good points than bad and I'm I glad I watched it. But I won't buy the CD, nor will I watch it again.
Bookmarks