A direct question.
And I want an honest answer from YOU.
I want you to freely disrobe and not disrespect this thread with falsity.
I am going to nip it in the bud right from the start - knowing full-well that most of you responding to this thread will completely ignore this next caveat:
THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT HOW YOU PERSONALLY ARE REVULSED AT THE VERY PROSPECT OF A PROG -NARCISSIST; NOR ABOUT HOW YOU DEEM YOURSELF TO BE ABOVE SUCH (ASSUMED) DISGRACEFUL BEHAVIOUR. I AM NOT INTESESTED IF YOU BELIEVE PROG-EGO IS A DISEASE.
.........
By its very nature, Progressive Rock is the aristocrat of rock n' roll.
On the landscape of music, pre-80s prog stived to be the loner, completely shorn of being meddled with by manipulants.
When the corporates became friskier and began manhandling, the bands were forced the less-lucrative route of private/ lesser-important labels. this usually lead to final band collapse, but their integrity remained to the last.
Prog then is the loner.
In some instances , beyond the rise-above-the-rabble Music itself, narcissistic leader personalities evolved. (You will say, this is no arguement because all rock is full of such - and I will agree with you.)
But this thread is not about narcissism in the music, but about narcissism inherent in yourself: the listener, the forum-poster, the collector.
I will go even deeper: do you look your nose down at certain folk (neophytes) within your own beloved musical volition?
......
I am trusting the moderators to not be unworthy and let this post through.
Bookmarks