I'm a huge fan, but those don't do much for me... from his more recent work I much prefer Singularity and Thin Air. But before getting into those, he should listen to The Future Now/PH7/Black Box if he hasn't already. Those are his very best, IMO.
And for more recent VDGG, both Trisector and Grounding in Numbers are as good as anything from the 70's, IMO.
Perspective Vortex - my new solo project available now at http://perspectivevortex.bandcamp.com
Mahtrak Progressive Jazz Rock - www.mahtrak.com
Nice, man.
You should hear A Grounding In Numbers at some point, IMO. It's a different beast compared to their earlier work, and without Jackson it couldn't help but sound pretty different, but it's a really cool record and a major leap forward from Trisector which was their first after Jackson left (I think) -- they were still finding their "post-Jaxxon sound" at that point, but on Numbers they found it I believe.
I've never been a major VDGG fan, but ever since I heard H to He and Pawn Hearts 10+ years ago, I've found them fascinating. Never heard a song like "Lemmings" before, or since. Still Life and Godbluff are both killers as well. I'll admit that Hammill's voice took some getting used to for me, but now I appreciate the rawness and intensity.
Think I'll put some VDGG on this morning while at work.
Have you listened to the album that Peter Hammill did with Isildurs Bane? In Amazonia? Dude... I love their music anyway, but Hammill's voice just elevates it to a whole other level, IMO. He's only gotten better with time.
Yes thanks for sharing that. I was at about the same age, first year at university (before I dropped out to travel) and PH hit me like a ton of bricks and seemed to perfectly express the "raging storm within" and all my existential angst as nothing else did or even came close to.
How can I be free?
How can I get help?
Am I really me?
Am I someone else?
The first two tracks of this album makes for one of the best openings of any Hammill-involved release. I couldn't believe it when I heard it, but on these two songs he sounds as if he's totally back on Still Life turf - not only in terms of sound but of state-of-mind. And yet it's an absolutely timeless and in-the-moment expression of mentality and sonic. Granted a tune like "Highly Strung" brings him right back to the Nadir phase of things, still you got to wonder... a couple of heartattacks and (AFAIK) some personal setbacks of seminal impact - how can he appear as quick and rapid and vital as this?
"Improvisation is not an excuse for musical laziness" - Fred Frith
"[...] things that we never dreamed of doing in Crimson or in any band that I've been in," - Tony Levin speaking of SGM
Interviewer of reprobate ne'er-do-well musicians of the long-haired rock n' roll persuasion at: www.velvetthunder.co.uk and former scribe at Classic Rock Society. Only vaguely aware of anything other than music.
*** Join me in the Garden of Delights for 3 hours of tune-spinning... every Saturday at 5pm EST on Deep Nuggets radio! www.deepnuggets.com ***
I looked up my initial post and pretty much agree with it:
To my ears, Hammill's singing began to change with Godbluff. He'll never be called "laconic," which is fine with me, but his delivery became increasingly declamatory (less aria-like and more recitative-ish, as it were), in which the words are at odds with the music. (Something similar happens in much of The Lamb....).
The songcraft that marks the earlier LPs, in which there is a hand-in-glove "fit" between words and music, began to rupture with Godbluff, "round" words being shoe-horned into "square" music, so to speak. (There are exceptions, of course, but this was the general trajectory).
Hell, they ain't even old-timey ! - Homer Stokes
Definitely an exciting journey to be starting. Obviously you've familiarized yourself with some of the heavy hitters in the catalogue, but believe me, there's plenty more to come! Much greatness lies ahead on the path you are going down...
Of course, this is what ends up happening if you become a rabid fan:
vdgg cds.jpg
hammill cds 4.jpg
Interviewer of reprobate ne'er-do-well musicians of the long-haired rock n' roll persuasion at: www.velvetthunder.co.uk and former scribe at Classic Rock Society. Only vaguely aware of anything other than music.
*** Join me in the Garden of Delights for 3 hours of tune-spinning... every Saturday at 5pm EST on Deep Nuggets radio! www.deepnuggets.com ***
Of the new(er) stuff, I really like Do Not Disturb and then (my #1 for the 00's) A Grounding In Numbers. Both fantastic discs.
If you're on Facebook, then please 'like' my VdGG page (I get exclusive stuff given to me, like Guy sending pix of his pre-VdGG bands, etc, for posting on my FB page). https://www.facebook.com/vandergraaf...?ref=bookmarks
The comparison to the beginning of Still Life is quite apt. I love those first two tracks, and they have a sense of easing into things much like "Pilgrims" does. Also, how many songs have their lyrics built around a mathematical equation involving pi, and actually make for a compelling listen?
Vital is exactly the right description too. Hammill has never sounded better than he did on Numbers and since, IMO. Not meant as a disservice to those classic albums, but time has deepened the qualities of his voice. I'm sure experience has something to do with that too. He seems like a good bloke; I'm glad he bounced back and has continued to give us some quality stuff at this point in his career, when many musicians would be content to just coast on their past.
I dug them from the get go. Pawn Hearts was my first, bit I think I might have had Fripp's Exposure before that and had already heard and dug Hammill.
Still Life was the next for me, and I freaking loved that sucker as well. This was all probably around 1991.
I've said this before, but I think the second ans third Ange albums were an unintentional prototype for where Van der Graaf ended up with Godbluff/Still Life. Strip it down and go right for the grit, but with all the "bigness" and "theatricality" intact.
I dig Do Not Disturb. The folks that dig the more recent stuff who don't have that sucker should get it.
OK. Bye.
Yes. Man-Erg was my first face-to-face encounter, and I have never recovered since.
It's amazing what these blind spots can do to us. I am almost embarrassed to bring up mine. It's completely random and personal. It takes effort to work one's way against them. But perhaps the reward is even greater then.
Interesting and valid analysis I think, however one exception that may prove the rule is Hammill's vocals on "Arrow" which are about as declamatory as it gets! If you don't like his screaming vocal "Impaled upon the arrow!", then the fiery essence of PH is not for you IMO. That searing vocal assault makes the biggest, baddest death-metal, cookie-monster's from hell vocals sound like a meek little girl crying for her mommie. Sad!
Very accurately expressed - and this is the reason I used to consider the second incarnation inferior to the first. The flow of lyrics in relation to the music seemed less natural and more forced in the second case. Of course I came to appreciate it for what it is, and love it with time. The strength of emotion justifies - or even calls for - any self-indulgence from Hammill's part.
And yes, you have to recite the line "...which no longer has any meaning" from Still life to get to the point of it all...
Last edited by Zappathustra; 11-04-2019 at 12:51 PM.
By the way - with reference to the seeming shift in the "fit" of PH's lyrics to the flow of the music - thinking about the words in Still Life, & especially about time & its passing, I looked back to Pioneers Over C - the difference is quite striking. To take just one example, compare the lines mentioned from Still Life with this "couplet" from the earlier track:
"Well now where is the time and who the hell am I,
here floating in an aimless way?"
I think this suggests that in some areas at least, PH had improved significantly as a writer (of words at least) over the course of these five years or so.
Bookmarks