Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 27 of 27

Thread: A Dichotomy in Taste: Liking Both Tight and Sloppy Music

  1. #26
    Subterranean Tapir Hobo Chang Ba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Frownland
    Posts
    2,419
    Quote Originally Posted by No Pride View Post
    I can dig "loose," but I can't dig "sloppy." There IS a difference. For me, "loose" implies a certain elasticity; a willingness to go out on a limb at the risk of that limb breaking. I'm all for that, especially when done by a band that can play tight when the music calls for that.

    "Sloppy" just means that the players aren't capable of properly articulating on their instruments. We don't accept any sort of incompetency in athletes, doctors, plumbers, cashiers... etc. Why is it okay for musicians?

    If "songs that have less than 15 chord changes" means "songs that have 3 chords," I generally can't dig that. There are exceptions; sometimes I'll love a 3 chord song and I can't explain why. But for the most part, typical and over-used chord progressions and harmonically simplistic music irks me. Maybe it's the "muso" in me... probably is. But with infinite possibilities within the realm of our 12 note system, I can't understand why anybody would gravitate to things that have already been done to death.
    Pretty much what I was going to say, just expressed much better than I would have done it.
    Please don't ask questions, just use google.

    Never let good music get in the way of making a profit.

    I'm only here to reglaze my bathtub.

  2. #27
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,125
    Quote Originally Posted by No Pride View Post
    I can dig "loose," but I can't dig "sloppy." There IS a difference. For me, "loose" implies a certain elasticity; a willingness to go out on a limb at the risk of that limb breaking. I'm all for that, especially when done by a band that can play tight when the music calls for that.

    "Sloppy" just means that the players aren't capable of properly articulating on their instruments. We don't accept any sort of incompetency in athletes, doctors, plumbers, cashiers... etc. Why is it okay for musicians?

    If "songs that have less than 15 chord changes" means "songs that have 3 chords," I generally can't dig that. There are exceptions; sometimes I'll love a 3 chord song and I can't explain why. But for the most part, typical and over-used chord progressions and harmonically simplistic music irks me. Maybe it's the "muso" in me... probably is. But with infinite possibilities within the realm of our 12 note system, I can't understand why anybody would gravitate to things that have already been done to death.
    I'd have to agree in general, but there are many exceptions

    but I do love "looser" moments in music... Nothing better than when a muso 'lets it go"
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •