I was listening to the Marillion Early Stages live box set on Spotify and was struck by just how god-awful Mick Pointer's drumming was on the earliest show (Glasgow, September '82). He had a terrible sense of time, was all over the place tempo-wise, very sloppy, and unable to execute the most rudimentary pattern smoothly (everything sounded herky-jerky). For some reason, for the next show in the set (December 30th of '82 at the Marquee - just three months later), he sounded much better in all areas, though still well below average.
I wonder why Mick decided to start a neo-progressive rock band, seeing as how the style requires more skill than your average rock gig, which he clearly didn't have. Drums are the backbone of a band and are supposed to hold everything together. His playing did just the opposite (the songs seemed on the verge of collapse at any given moment) and his ability fell very far short of the required mark. I'm thankful that he founded the band and all (because of what they went on to achieve), but if he hadn't done so would Mick Pointer even be a footnote in prog history?
I haven't delved into Arena (no real desire to), but please tell me his playing in that band doesn't sound anything like it did in the early '80s. I don't think I could handle that.
Bookmarks