Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 148

Thread: Chances of Genesis Deluxe Editions?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Stamford, CT
    Posts
    355

    Chances of Genesis Deluxe Editions?

    Seems to be all the rage (CDs last gasp) these days to release high priced deluxe editions of classic albums. Was thinking bout this the other day (too much time on my hands clearly) - I wonder what the chances are of the classic Genesis albums getting such treatment? OK, I’m a realist, so probably somewhere between slim and none. Might be a good way to monetize the catalog though. Would be cool too; well, to me anyhow. It’s closing in 15 years since the remixes came out. How about the original mix, 2008 mix, 5.1 on Blu-ray and a full concert from the album tour. Nice lol.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Austin Texas
    Posts
    792
    There was a deluxe "Lamb" mentioned last year, much discussion on the Hoffman forum after it was mentioned in an article. Steve Hackett commented later (on Facebook?) that it was on the back burner (my words) due to Covid.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    447
    0% of the Genesis catalog is currently available as hi res downloads. They need to pull a Pink Floyd and reissue everything.

  4. #4
    Member Koreabruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Chuncheon, South Korea
    Posts
    1,585
    I'd settle for flat transfers from the original master tapes and not the Nick Davis remixes or the "Definitive" versions released prior to those.

  5. #5
    Member Hour Candle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Progressive Sweden
    Posts
    553
    Quote Originally Posted by Koreabruce View Post
    I'd settle for flat transfers from the original master tapes and not the Nick Davis remixes or the "Definitive" versions released prior to those.
    This! I just can't stand the Nick Davis ones. I gave them away after first listen. Poor people that got them..

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Isle of Bute
    Posts
    508
    Unless you're into surround the Genesis studio albums are a poorly served bunch.

    I'd sell organs for flat transfers and/or sympathetic remixes of those early albums.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by ca1ore View Post
    Seems to be all the rage (CDs last gasp) these days to release high priced deluxe editions of classic albums. Was thinking bout this the other day (too much time on my hands clearly) - I wonder what the chances are of the classic Genesis albums getting such treatment? OK, I’m a realist, so probably somewhere between slim and none. Might be a good way to monetize the catalog though. Would be cool too; well, to me anyhow. It’s closing in 15 years since the remixes came out. How about the original mix, 2008 mix, 5.1 on Blu-ray and a full concert from the album tour. Nice lol.
    I agree; it would be nice to have Deluxe Editions of the Genesis albums. I'd love to have the original mixes (flat transferred of course), instrumental mixes and 5.1/Dolby Atmos mixes on Blu-Rays (and IMHO they could leave the 2007/2008 mixes by Nick Davis on the shelf).

  8. #8
    Member moecurlythanu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    The Planet Lovetron
    Posts
    13,613
    Weren't the original CD releases on Virgin/Charisma flat transfers? I haven't listened to them in yonks, but iirc, the tape hiss is audible.

  9. #9
    Studmuffin Scott Bails's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Near Philly, PA
    Posts
    6,587
    The Genesis guys seem to have no value at all for their archival material. Hoping that they'll consider the potential revenue stream of release some special editions, live releases, etc. now that they won't be touring anymore.
    Music isn't about chops, or even about talent - it's about sound and the way that sound communicates to people. Mike Keneally

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    1,118
    It seems to me the band consider they were among the first to go that route with their 2007/2008 boxsets.

    Of course there are a lot of haters of the Nick Davis remixes but I'm not sure the band would think it worthwhile to reissue the albums just so someone else could have a crack at remixing them. It seems they still consider Davis as the curator of their legacy and wouldn't hand the remixes to anyone else. I'm also not sure I'd buy them all again if a new remix was all that was added.

    They would also have to add more archival material than was already included in those boxsets. Unless they take that chance to issue all the live multitracks and soundboards they have in their archives as bonus material, I don't think there would be anything interesting they could add to new reissues.

  11. #11
    There are some folks who hate the 2007/2008 remixes; I don't know what percentage of the fan base it actually is, but there were definitely a few on the official Genesis forum back when it still existed.

    The project was a monumental undertaking though. Mixing all of their studio catalog (except for FGTR) for 5.1, and then their live albums too. I do think that some folks still fail to realize that the 5.1 (and hi-res) mixes were the primary purpose of those reissues, and not the new stereo mixes. It's still one of the best reissues of a band's back catalog, as far as I'm concerned. Would love to see more archival stuff released though.
    "what's better, peanut butter or g-sharp minor?"
    - Sturgeon's Lawyer, 2021

  12. #12
    The eons are closing
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    NY/NJ
    Posts
    4,239
    Quote Originally Posted by aith01 View Post
    T. I do think that some folks still fail to realize that the 5.1 (and hi-res) mixes were the primary purpose of those reissues, and not the new stereo mixes. It's still one of the best reissues of a band's back catalog, as far as I'm concerned. Would love to see more archival stuff released though.
    If you serve a dinner plate of filet mignon, whipped garlic mashed potatoes, and a turd - you cannot argue that the primary point of the meal was the steak and potatoes and we should ignore the turd.

    It's on the plate - if you didn't want to distract from your primary goal - don't serve it.

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
    Death inspires me like a dog inspires a rabbit

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by MudShark22 View Post
    If you serve a dinner plate of filet mignon, whipped garlic mashed potatoes, and a turd - you cannot argue that the primary point of the meal was the steak and potatoes and we should ignore the turd.

    It's on the plate - if you didn't want to distract from your primary goal - don't serve it.

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
    Uhm. No, that's hardly an accurate metaphor. C'mon man.

    Everyone's ears are different, and the stereo mixes sound fine to my ears. It's not an absolute. I still stand by what I said.

    I'm sorry, but I don't agree about the quality of the Nick Davis mixes; they aren't that bad, they just aren't. Certainly not enough to "distract" from the 5.1 mixes. If you don't want the 5.1 mixes, and don't like the new stereo mixes, then don't buy the boxes/reissues. It's not complicated.
    Last edited by aith01; 01-07-2022 at 02:46 PM.
    "what's better, peanut butter or g-sharp minor?"
    - Sturgeon's Lawyer, 2021

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Streets of San Francisco
    Posts
    549
    Quote Originally Posted by aith01 View Post
    Uhm. No, that's hardly an accurate metaphor. C'mon man.

    Everyone's ears are different, and the stereo mixes sound fine to my ears. It's not an absolute. I still stand by what I said.

    I'm sorry, but I don't agree about the quality of the Nick Davis mixes; they aren't that bad, they just aren't. Certainly not enough to "distract" from the 5.1 mixes. If you don't want the 5.1 mixes, and don't like the new stereo mixes, then don't buy the boxes/reissues. It's not complicated.
    I tend to agree with this take... I'm no professional but I have always liked what I've heard from the box sets. I have decent equipment as well, Onkyo, Denon and B&W speakers... not top of the line but certainly not entry level. I'm not discounting others that don't like the mixes we all hear things differently much like we taste things differently like wine for example. I don't agree with every top rated wine review that I taste. That might be an over simplification but it was the best I could come up with! Having said that it would be interesting to sit down and listen to one of the mixes with someone who dislikes a particular mix of one of the LP's and have them point out the shortcomings.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Stamford, CT
    Posts
    355
    Well, I bought the 2007/8 boxes solely for the surround mixes.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Stamford, CT
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by LeFrog View Post
    Unless they take that chance to issue all the live multitracks and soundboards they have in their archives as bonus material
    Yes, but that WOULD be awesome. Tons of unreleased stuff.

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    1,118
    As others have pointed out in a less convoluted way than me, the existing boxsets are already very good and pretty hard to beat.

    The Davis haters are very vocal but I doubt the majority of fans would buy a reissue just for yet another remix replacing the Davis mixes.

    Again, I believe only a substantial amount of archival live material as bonus would warrant new reissues.

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    1,118
    Quote Originally Posted by ca1ore View Post
    Yes, but that WOULD be awesome. Tons of unreleased stuff.
    Hell yes but we all know it's not happening. They missed so many windows of opportunity for releasing this stuff that the likelihood just gets lower over time.

  19. #19
    I like the Nick Davis remixes on vinyl. To me they sound great.

    Now, some of the remixes on CD are very harsh to my ears (especially the Trick - Abacab eras), but as mentioned we all hear differently.

    As others suggested above, I'd love for archival concerts / demos / other video footage to be released. Ah if only !

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Flightwave View Post
    I like the Nick Davis remixes on vinyl. To me they sound great.
    I've got the blue box set on vinyl, and it sounds great to me also. One of the best music investments I've ever made.
    "what's better, peanut butter or g-sharp minor?"
    - Sturgeon's Lawyer, 2021

  21. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by aith01 View Post
    I've got the blue box set on vinyl, and it sounds great to me also. One of the best music investments I've ever made.
    That's a great sounding vinyl box, especially "Wind and Wuthering". To my ears, that version of "Duke" on vinyl is the best, it's cleaned up considerably and no longer muddy and thick like prior pressings.

  22. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Stamford, CT
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by LeFrog View Post
    Hell yes but we all know it's not happening. They missed so many windows of opportunity for releasing this stuff that the likelihood just gets lower over time.
    Yah, noted that in my initial post. Doesn’t mean one cannot daydream though

  23. #23
    Member moecurlythanu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    The Planet Lovetron
    Posts
    13,613
    Imo, the purpose of remixes is to hear things that were buried in the mix, different points of emphasis and the like. They don't supersede previous mixes. They are a new and different view into a country that is well known, and they illuminate things that were not seen before. On that basis, the Davis remixes succeed wonderfully. So glad that I have them.

  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by moecurlythanu View Post
    Imo, the purpose of remixes is to hear things that were buried in the mix, different points of emphasis and the like. They don't supersede previous mixes. They are a new and different view into a country that is well known, and they illuminate things that were not seen before. On that basis, the Davis remixes succeed wonderfully. So glad that I have them.
    I agree with this assessment, however that still means that the original stereo mixes have not been remastered to hi-res using the best available technology, and the CDs remain the last (digital) word on these versions. Unless the original stereo master tapes are in a poor condition and we are stuck with what we already have, a high-quality hi-res capture of the original stereo masters would not consume nearly as much time and resources as the Davis project. The original stereo mixes in hi-res is a gap in their catalogue, and appears more obvious as more and more historical music is made available in hi-res.

  25. #25
    Member Top Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    N of Clearwater, Florida
    Posts
    3,007
    I didn't like the cd versions and sold my boxset to fund getting the vinyl set(Phil era).
    Don't know why, but they sound much better, and I also have used copies on vinyl to compare them to.
    Some of the original recordings have issues, and I don't think there is much you can do to fix them.
    I've found the Genesis album to be extremely bright in parts of it, regardless of what versions I have(I still have the definitive edition on cd).
    Last edited by Top Cat; 01-08-2022 at 10:44 AM.
    Soundcloud page: Richard Hermans, musical meanderings https://soundcloud.com/precipice YouTube: [https://www.youtube.com/@richardhermans4457

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •