Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 102

Thread: Cycling 2013 (no Armstrong please)

  1. #51
    as I said common practice

    few pictures for illustration

    cycling-contact-sport.jpg
    spt_cycling030729.jpg

  2. #52
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,116
    Quote Originally Posted by thedunno View Post
    To me this was a fully intentional shoulder charge. You clearly see him turn his shoulder for impact. Tom Veelers did go a little bit to the right, but not much. Of course he was happy to black Cavendish a bit but thats all in the game. There was room enough to pass.

    Cav put himself in the wrong position. Greipel and KIttel were starting their sprint on the left side of the road. Cav wanted to catch their wheel but couldn't; Veelers was in the way. So BAM!!..and Veelers was out of the way. It was an act of sheer fustration with which he could have caused serious injury to one of his colleagues.
    Well the shoulder but was probably intentional, but defensive from what I saw yesterday... he did ok to defend his line... if he hadn't done that, he'd have found himself on the road instead of that Degencolb guy

    ====================

    Well it's kind of over now (today) ...

    thing is that Sky's overall team performance reminds everyone of Radioshack/ Discovery Channel/ US Postal....

    Most likely these guys are not running on spring water alone...
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  3. #53
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,116
    Somebody sprayed Cav with urine during yesterday's time trial...
    while I still think he wasn't wrong on that latest incident, this goes a long way to show how much of an arrogant prick he's been during the last 4 years... and the public is showing it to him (however tastelessly it is)

    but he's got a good chance at winning today (a massive sprint is likely)
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  4. #54
    another dirty trick...see the block on Sagan


  5. #55
    Here we go again http://sports.yahoo.com/news/froomes...9134--spt.html

    The sad part is that it sounds all that familiar...accusation, responses....I think the sport will be doomed for some time...

    What do you think ?

  6. #56
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,116
    There is little doubt in my mind that team Sky's dominatuion (I'm going to ne nice and not say "squisshing") of all the stage races they entered in in the last two years (except for last year's Spanish Vuelta, where Contador attacked 24 times before finally winning over Froome) in more than suspect in my eyes...

    Actually I can't believe after the Festina and Armstrong scandals) how a team still dares to sit all over a race the way they do... (I even suspect that they "ease up" on some stage, lose some ground and pretend to have an off)day as a make believe that they'd be clean)

    Obviously, this team uses "technology" that's not yet available to others...
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  7. #57
    I'm here for the moosic NogbadTheBad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    10,256
    Surely not, Froome & Wiggins are British (or compete under that flag of convenience), how could you accuse them of such a thing? Mind you isn't Sky owned by an Australian?

    They are all suspect, every last one of them, at this stage the sports reputation occupies the same exalted ground as Body Building & Professional Wrestling.
    Ian

    Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on progrock.com
    https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-a...re-happy-hour/

    Gordon Haskell - "You've got to keep the groove in your head and play a load of bollocks instead"
    I blame Wynton, what was the question?
    There are only 10 types of people in the World, those who understand binary and those that don't.

  8. #58
    Member thedunno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,128
    I do not think that SKy is really dominating the tour. Yesterday the team and Ritchie Porte in particular was strong, on other days they were nowhere to be seen. I think the only thing that gave some cyclists hope (that is, before yesterday) is that the Sky team showed weaknesses. On the stage to Lyon the team completely failed to protect to protect Froome. On the second stage in the pyrennees Froome was completely alone. There is really only 1 man that is dominating the tour.

    It is only a question who becomes second. As a Dutch I hope for Mollema but i think it will be that colombian.

    I dont buy the 'secret technology'. Froome is better then the rest at the moment. But so was Eddie Merckx in his time. Is he now also a suspect of using drugs that others didn't have at the time?
    Even lance didn't use 'secret technology'. If he did the whole peleton were using the same 'secret technology'.

    I think its very sad you cannot simply be very good without getting accused of using drugs.
    Last edited by thedunno; 07-15-2013 at 09:52 AM.

  9. #59
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,116
    The first stage in the Pyrénées was also all Sky... Yes, they were a little down on the second Pyrénées stage, but so was everybdy >> no-one attacked Froome that day, until it was all too late. And yes, they got caught offgard by the wind factor on that stage (the one before they got to Lyon), but they limited the damage (that Valverde's team couldn't)

    by "technology", I meant substances, of course...
    although, in terms or real technology, some teams are using special front platters nowadays >> a bit oval (instead of perfectly round), to optimize every single angle of the pedalling cycle ...

    And indeed, Merckx most probably didn't run on clean water either... but back then it was mostly steroids and amphetamines, which were easily traceable... Don't forget that in the 60's guys like Simpson doped themselves with two shots of whisky before going up the hill.
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  10. #60
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,116
    Quote Originally Posted by NogbadTheBad View Post
    Surely not, Froome & Wiggins are British (or compete under that flag of convenience), how could you accuse them of such a thing? Mind you isn't Sky owned by an Australian?

    They are all suspect, every last one of them, at this stage the sports reputation occupies the same exalted ground as Body Building & Professional Wrestling.
    The huge difference is that Cycling is a sport that really tries to tackle and curb the problem >> which is of course making big headlines, but obviously not the good way


    Froome went up the mont Ventoux - which is also the Mont Chauve (Bald Mountain) of Moussorgski fame - quicker than Pantani and Armstrong did (they were two, with an immense rivalry)... And this was the longest stage of the tour...
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  11. #61
    Moderator Duncan Glenday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    2,104
    So the moment one athlete does well, he's automatically assumed to be a doper?
    Regards,

    Duncan

  12. #62
    I'm here for the moosic NogbadTheBad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    10,256
    Of course.
    Ian

    Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on progrock.com
    https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-a...re-happy-hour/

    Gordon Haskell - "You've got to keep the groove in your head and play a load of bollocks instead"
    I blame Wynton, what was the question?
    There are only 10 types of people in the World, those who understand binary and those that don't.

  13. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by Duncan Glenday View Post
    So the moment one athlete does well, he's automatically assumed to be a doper?
    It's only natural...

    ...really, the guy who is 28 years old and he was till 2 years ago "a nobody", now he is unbeatable...so people have questions...

  14. #64
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,116
    Quote Originally Posted by Progmatic View Post
    Originally Posted by Duncan Glenday
    So the moment one athlete does well, he's automatically assumed to be a doper?
    It's only natural...

    ...really, the guy who is 28 years old and he was till 2 years ago "a nobody", now he is unbeatable...so people have questions...
    we can say the same of Wiggins, who was anything but a climber when riding for French teams (FDJ namely)... as soon as he got out, he became a climber in his newteam...

    I'm not sure that it's "natural"... but in this day and age with the money involved, it's inevitable
    Especially when there are followers in the trail (let's face it: the Jamaican athletics sprint school is highly suspect to my eyes as well)
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  15. #65
    Moderator Duncan Glenday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    2,104
    Last year, Froome's climbing ability basically won the Tour for Wiggins.

    He came second in the Tour last year.

    2012 - 3rd in the Time trial, Olympic Games, and 4th Vuelta a España

    2011 - 2nd in the Vuelta a España

    2010 - 3rd in the National Time Trial Championship



    This ain't a flash in-the-pan.
    Regards,

    Duncan

  16. #66
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,116
    Quote Originally Posted by Duncan Glenday View Post
    Last year, Froome's climbing ability basically won the Tour for Wiggins.

    He came second in the Tour last year.

    2012 - 3rd in the Time trial, Olympic Games, and 4th Vuelta a España

    2011 - 2nd in the Vuelta a España

    2010 - 3rd in the National Time Trial Championship

    This ain't a flash in-the-pan.
    and before that??
    I mean, the man is 28 now (if I read right)... talented riders are known/spotted in the late teens or early 20's....
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  17. #67
    Moderator Duncan Glenday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    2,104
    Before that he was living in Africa, where they don't have access to (a) the big races, and (b) the professional training techniques available in Europe / USA.
    Regards,

    Duncan

  18. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by Trane View Post
    and before that??
    I mean, the man is 28 now (if I read right)... talented riders are known/spotted in the late teens or early 20's....
    That is what I was referring to...LA, though he was a cheater, he has long history of achievements prior his "success" in TdF, including junior cycling and other sports like swimming, he was known athlete...

    This guy was nobody in 2010 and most of 2011 and then suddenly he had to be held back by Sky team in 2012 TdF so Wiggins can win ?!

  19. #69
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,116
    Quote Originally Posted by Duncan Glenday View Post
    Before that he was living in Africa, where they don't have access to (a) the big races, and (b) the professional training techniques available in Europe / USA.
    I'm not too famuiliar with his family life (though yeah, he was born in Kenya, but went to jo'burg (Rep of South Africa) for a number of years... and they have excellent sport facilities there...

    (BTW, I find Oscar Pistorius' performances suspect as well , but only because of illegal technology >> blades)
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  20. #70
    Member thedunno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,128
    Froome DOES use some special technology; he uses an oval shaped chainring.
    http://cycletechreview.com/2012/news...our-de-france/

    Theoretically this IS an advantage, because it shortens the time you can not put full force on your pedals. This is not a secret technology; it is around a few years and available to all. Most of the riders simply do not like it. Of course; if you are riding with a round chainring all your life this will feel very weird. Froome DID take the time and training hours to adjust to this new technology.

    According to experts there hasn't been an official research on how much advantage this oval shaped chainring actually gives. They suspect that especially uphill the advantage might be substantial.

  21. #71
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,116
    I think I mentioned that a few posts ago... but this isn't that new, and I suspect he's not the only one...

    This said, the advantage can't be as evident as Greg LeMond's then-illegal tri-athlete handlebars in g-his TdF 89 win... he admitted that he gained up to 3 minutes in that tour's time trials of that year...
    But I read somewhere that some experts think that he (GLM) was the last more or less clean tour winner (I'd tend to believe it), despite the illegal technology >> by next year the tri-athlete handlebars were made legal...
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  22. #72
    Quote Originally Posted by thedunno View Post
    Froome DOES use some special technology; he uses an oval shaped chainring.
    http://cycletechreview.com/2012/news...our-de-france/

    Theoretically this IS an advantage, because it shortens the time you can not put full force on your pedals. This is not a secret technology; it is around a few years and available to all. Most of the riders simply do not like it. Of course; if you are riding with a round chainring all your life this will feel very weird. Froome DID take the time and training hours to adjust to this new technology.

    According to experts there hasn't been an official research on how much advantage this oval shaped chainring actually gives. They suspect that especially uphill the advantage might be substantial.
    my first reaction to it, as someone who studied tons of physics in his life, is that there is no advantage since the amount of work you have to generate does not change...(assuming other parameters of the bike stays the same)...what I do not know is whether there is some advantage to the way your body reacts to periodic variation of the applied force on pedals...with the cadence of 80 to 100 I would think there should be no difference but....

  23. #73
    Moderator Duncan Glenday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Frederick, MD
    Posts
    2,104
    Quote Originally Posted by Trane View Post
    ...
    went to jo'burg (Rep of South Africa) for a number of years... and they have excellent sport facilities there...
    ...
    They don't.

    They have some good training facilities, but not many.

    Also, cyclists cannot train on the roads because (a) the road surfaces aren't very good, (a) there's a deep history of unlicensed motorists killing road riders, and (b) cyclists are often mugged and their bikes are stolen. Any South African road rider (Impey, Hunter, etc.) who wants to make it has to get out of that country and go to Europe or the USA - and only then will their careers take off.

    The sad thing is - this was not always the case. It used to be possible to be a successful road rider in that country, and to train quite safely.

    There are a FEW very high tech sports training facilities there, but they're only available to a very few elite athletes - usually runners, rather than cyclists.

    BTW - Because of these problems with road riding in S.A., most of their cyclists have taken to the track and to mountain biking.

    Quote Originally Posted by thedunno View Post
    Froome DOES use some special technology; he uses an oval shaped chainring.
    http://cycletechreview.com/2012/news...our-de-france/

    Theoretically this IS an advantage, because it shortens the time you can not put full force on your pedals. This is not a secret technology; it is around a few years and available to all. Most of the riders simply do not like it. Of course; if you are riding with a round chainring all your life this will feel very weird. Froome DID take the time and training hours to adjust to this new technology.
    ...
    True. Wiggins also used it - last year.

    Quote Originally Posted by Progmatic View Post
    my first reaction to it, as someone who studied tons of physics in his life, is that there is no advantage since the amount of work you have to generate does not change...(assuming other parameters of the bike stays the same)...what I do not know is whether there is some advantage to the way your body reacts to periodic variation of the applied force on pedals...with the cadence of 80 to 100 I would think there should be no difference but....
    It definitely is an advantage, because you're effectively changing the gearing based on which leg muscles are in use at each part of the revolution.

    I.e. on the power stroke, your gearing is a bit longer. On the part of the revolution when you're using less powerful muscles (pushing forward at the top, pulling back at the bottom), the gearing is shorter. This allows you to maximize the effect of each part of the pedal stroke more effectively than people with standard gearing systems.
    Regards,

    Duncan

  24. #74
    Quote Originally Posted by Duncan Glenday View Post
    It definitely is an advantage, because you're effectively changing the gearing based on which leg muscles are in use at each part of the revolution.

    I.e. on the power stroke, your gearing is a bit longer. On the part of the revolution when you're using less powerful muscles (pushing forward at the top, pulling back at the bottom), the gearing is shorter. This allows you to maximize the effect of each part of the pedal stroke more effectively than people with standard gearing systems.
    OK I buy it, you basically distribute more evenly the work between the muscles otherwise you may overuse some of them...

  25. #75
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,116
    Well, sadly, only the TdF still racks up much interest... I started this thread in early March.... and it ammassed 35 replies (50%) ... of which 75% were mine...

    Ever since the first TdF stage with the bus incident, the thread has doubled its post count in 17 days...
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •