I'd welcome a new TULL album, doubt that it'll ever happen. Ian has said to Barre that he "don't want to be in Tull anymore". I know this is i failure of mine but i'm a Tull fan with no interest in tull members solo albums. Not even Ians. I am like that with most bands. I have very few Beatle solo recordings as well despite being a huge Beatles fan.
I can take his singing on studio recordings but live it's just too painfull. Phrasing several beats behind the rhythm as if he is totally out of breath (really it's the phrasing that throws me off more than his inability to hit the high notes). Watching him standing with his head stretched upwards while it looks as if his eyes are about to pop out. Painfull painfull painfull..... I've seen him when he was in better shape and i'll just cherish that memory instead of tarnishing it with how he was when i last saw Tull.
The thing is, the completist in me is more forgiving of a medoicre album from a band i love simply because i love to have some new music from that band. But if it's a solo album it will have to be real good because i'm not inherently a fan of the solo artist. And TAAB2 was mediocre. Had it been a tull album i would have enjoyed it a bit more because it was new music from a band i love. But as an album that have to prove itself by its merits only i just didn't like it enough. Same thing if the Crimson Project should decide to record an album of new music. It would have to be damn good for me to be interested, whereas if King Crimson should release a "lesser" album i'd be more acceptant of it because i'm a King Crimson fan.
Most will disagree and say only the music should count, not who played it, but i am always a bit emotionally attached to bands / artists that i love and have followed many years.
Bookmarks