Yeah, no axe to grind here.
You are absolutely correct that it's unfair to label any group of people with broad brush strokes. And based on the observations from others in this thread, the real world and the online world can provide two different perceptions of reality.
I agree with you and others that media and social media amplify extremes. I call it the "shark attack" syndrome. If a shark attack occurs anywhere around the U.S. you might hear about it. But if there happen to be 2 or 3 shark attacks within a few weeks, it becomes national news. Amplify it more and people won't dip their feet in the ocean or cancel their vacation. Recently there has been a lot of talk about NFTs, but the discussion is mostly around the absurd aspects of it.
So if someone gets in a fight because they refused to wear a mask, that incident will likely get amplified or even nationalized. And when you see multiple stories like this, it gives the impression that this is rampant, when it's not necessarily so.
That said, the internet/social media does bring out the "loud" voices. Those voices can be so overwhelming and ubiquitous that it can give the impression that all of the stereotypes about someone's politics/religion/race/culture etc. are valid ones. Go to just about any popular social media site or current events site with a comments section and you will see rampant anger, hatred, virtue signaling, and more. It's so depressing to see. One notable example for me was reading the comments section on a sponsored ad from Johnson & Johnson about vaccines. The vast majority of comments were negative, angry, and laden with misinformation and conspiracy theories.
But consider where a lot of this comes from. In a most current example, there was a senate hearing on COVID response yesterday and Rand Paul used it to accuse Dr. Fauci of wearing masks "for show" even though he's been vaccinated. Even if you disagree with Fauci, it's the language and tone used during this exchange that is the larger problem. There are countless other examples like this that sow doubt in masks, vaccines, the response, and more.
The point is that this "resistance" mindset has been propagated by conservative leadership for over a year. And Rand Paul is not an anomaly in the party. It's pretty much the party line and that of the former President. And because of the conservative ecosystem, this is amplified down the chain - from the President, Congress, state legislators, conservative media, social media, YouTubers, and more. And as the leadership is positively reinforced by their electorate, the cycle continues.
This cyclical approach was similar during the election, which culminated in the storming of the Capitol, and now back up to the legislatures as conservatives across the states work to pass legislation in the name of voter fraud.
So while the loud voices can tend to steal the megaphone and media can amplify the extreme, you have to ask yourself about the conservative "brand" and its responsibility in all of this. Conservative leadership and media have greatly exacerbated the problems and perceptions of the Republican party by their words and actions. If you want to protect the conservative brand as you see it and you feel it doesn't reflect you and others, then your BEEF is with those who identify as conservative who are putting a stain on it. Directing your ire towards angry liberals seems misplaced.
Bookmarks