Listened to it today. Udi is right, the main differences I hear are instrumental balances, but I did enjoy it because it brought different things to the fore. Not sure if it was a more "cohesive" mix but I think it has some validity.
Listened to it today. Udi is right, the main differences I hear are instrumental balances, but I did enjoy it because it brought different things to the fore. Not sure if it was a more "cohesive" mix but I think it has some validity.
Originally Posted by Steve F.
I'll take your word about CDD for it, though.
yup, not jumping on that Trane either
my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.
Tu saoules, Trane !yup, not jumping on that Trane either
(C'ιtait juste pour le jeu de mots !)
Calyx (Canterbury Scene) - http://www.calyx-canterbury.fr
Legends In Their Own Lunchtime (blog) - https://canterburyscene.wordpress.com/
My latest books : "Yes" (2017) - https://lemotetlereste.com/musiques/yes/ + "L'Ecole de Canterbury" (2016) - http://lemotetlereste.com/musiques/lecoledecanterbury/ + "King Crimson" (2012/updated 2018) - http://lemotetlereste.com/musiques/kingcrimson/
Canterbury & prog interviews - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdf...IUPxUMA/videos
Lowering Guys bass is just wrong.
I also think it was mixed too low on Heresie remix/remaster
as stated, "what a surprise"
Steve F.
www.waysidemusic.com
www.cuneiformrecords.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Remember, if it doesn't say "Cuneiform," it's not prog! - THE Jed Levin
Any time any one speaks to me about any musical project, the one absolute given is "it will not make big money". [tip of the hat to HK]
"Death to false 'support the scene' prog!"
please add 'imo' wherever you like, to avoid offending those easily offended.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks