Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789
Results 201 to 208 of 208

Thread: The Future of Progressive Rock

  1. #201
    Member since March 2004 mozo-pg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    9,138
    This is the second post on this thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by mozo-pg View Post
    What is Prog?
    What can this strange device be? When I touch it, it brings forth a sound...

  2. #202
    Quote Originally Posted by mozo-pg View Post
    This is the second post on this thread.
    Argh! I missed it.

  3. #203
    Member moecurlythanu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Crimea River
    Posts
    5,693
    Quote Originally Posted by MYSTERIOUS TRAVELLER View Post
    still, I do not understand why it's always so monochromatic even among those who understand prog to be of a greater creative palette.... just bizarre. I guess I should be happy that at least Zappa had some artists of color in his bands
    Just curious...Serious question...Why does the color of the artists matter?

  4. #204
    But do we really see these folks arguing that Magma and AREA aren't Progressive Rock? If so, where? They may not like those bands (heck, I'm not a huge Magma fan myself), but must we like everything?
    FWIW, Christian Vander does not see Magma as prog. But the question: what is the future of prog, is of interest if only one could attempt to answer what is we are asking the future of. Much of this thread is about who or what is prog- with an agreement of the classic prog bands and not much else. But is today's KC a prog band? If so, why? If not, why not? And in the end, what does it matter? Are we concerned about the genre, or about being able to hear interesting new music, period? I am not much of one to worry about how to classify what I like. It then becomes an ownership kind of issue- I love my definition of prog because it means something to me. And I will fight with others about this because my meaning is the only meaning I can accept for whatever emotional resonance it brings me.... This is like any other fandom, wherein people invest into things. And then argue for their take on it. YMMV.
    I'm not lazy. I just work so fast I'm always done.

  5. #205
    Member Since: 3/27/2002 MYSTERIOUS TRAVELLER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    The Kingdom of YHVH
    Posts
    2,200
    Quote Originally Posted by moecurlythanu View Post
    Just curious...Serious question...Why does the color of the artists matter?
    the exclusion is the problem

    especially given the contributions of all the non-white artists to the advent of the progressive Rock scene in the late 60s-early 70s

    this is quite poignant in 2019 especially. Someone who is a closet racist never has to let an epithet slip from their mouths but if they talk enough, they will expose their bias in the constant 'they are not welcome here' position. Again, a racist never has to actually come out and say "they are not welcome here" but the deliberate and continuous exclusion of "them" is the tell all.

    10 years ago there were people running around saying 'racism doesn't exist in the mainstream anymore' but the reality was quite different. Racists rarely are open and honest about their racism, they can quietly practice their vile personality disorders through the voting booth or by continuously putting forth only white artists as being prog.

    I wasn't going to be that blunt but you asked
    Why is it whenever someone mentions an artist that was clearly progressive (yet not the Symph weenie definition of Prog) do certain people feel compelled to snort "thats not Prog" like a whiny 5th grader?

  6. #206
    Quote Originally Posted by Dana5140 View Post
    FWIW, Christian Vander does not see Magma as prog. But the question: what is the future of prog, is of interest if only one could attempt to answer what is we are asking the future of. Much of this thread is about who or what is prog- with an agreement of the classic prog bands and not much else. But is today's KC a prog band? If so, why? If not, why not? And in the end, what does it matter? Are we concerned about the genre, or about being able to hear interesting new music, period? I am not much of one to worry about how to classify what I like. It then becomes an ownership kind of issue- I love my definition of prog because it means something to me. And I will fight with others about this because my meaning is the only meaning I can accept for whatever emotional resonance it brings me.... This is like any other fandom, wherein people invest into things. And then argue for their take on it. YMMV.
    You are making a really, really good point. This isn't an issue worth fighting about or becoming entrenched in, and despite my own personal opinions on the subject I actually remain open to the potions of others and in some sense hope someone will prove me wrong, or at least make a serious attempt at doing so.

    Your question about KC is great, but there are two answers. Are they progressive, as in literally moving music forward at this point in their career? Probably not (though if they focused more on new music, who's to say?). But are they representative of a genre or style that has been classified as "Progressive Rock" (capital P, a noun)? Absolutely, even at this point in their career. So it's a very tricky question to answer, and you don't have to have a huge steak in a particular position to be caught in the conundrum of that issue.

    Does it matter? You ask are we concerned about the genre, or just hearing new, interesting music. To me, it's the same question. The music that interests me the most happens to fall most squarely under the Progressive Rock banner, as I define it (which fits a majority, though not all, of the bands one would normally associate with the style, including Magma... sorry Christian ). It matters enough to some people to make Gypsy Jazz music, music highly influenced by Django Reinhardt and the Hot Club, down to the guitars they used and the particular way they strummed them. There's a small but dedicated audience for that music, and artists who cater to that style. There's even yearly week-long master classes for those interested in learning the style. And if you're really lucky, you might just encounter a Gypsy Jazz band playing on a street in Paris or Madrid. Does Gypsy Jazz matter? It does to fans of the style, and the artists that enjoy playing that music. And the style doesn't need to become something else to please its fan base.

    So why can't the same be true of Progressive Rock? Because it's supposed to be "progressive?" If there aren't enough people to support this kind of music, then let it die, I'm fine with that. But if you value something, and others do too, what's the harm in tying to see it move on in some way? And if that "scene" can have influence on other scenes and plant seeds or make connections, where's the harm? In the end, I guess there's either a critical mass of people who have enough of a common perception of what is of value within "Progressive Rock" to be preserved, or there's not. If it's just everyone liking what they like and not worrying about its classification then it's every person for themselves. that's fine, but it's very unlikely you'll see the kind of support for a particular style like you do with Gypsy Jazz.

    I agree with you, it's not worth becoming entrenched or fighting about it. But I think it's worth understanding the consequences of that, which-ever side of the equation you wind up on.

    Bill

  7. #207
    Member moecurlythanu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Crimea River
    Posts
    5,693
    Quote Originally Posted by MYSTERIOUS TRAVELLER View Post
    the exclusion is the problem

    especially given the contributions of all the non-white artists to the advent of the progressive Rock scene in the late 60s-early 70s

    this is quite poignant in 2019 especially. Someone who is a closet racist never has to let an epithet slip from their mouths but if they talk enough, they will expose their bias in the constant 'they are not welcome here' position. Again, a racist never has to actually come out and say "they are not welcome here" but the deliberate and continuous exclusion of "them" is the tell all.

    10 years ago there were people running around saying 'racism doesn't exist in the mainstream anymore' but the reality was quite different. Racists rarely are open and honest about their racism, they can quietly practice their vile personality disorders through the voting booth or by continuously putting forth only white artists as being prog.

    I wasn't going to be that blunt but you asked
    I'm glad I did. But for Prog-Rock, all of the artists live in the ghetto, regardless of skin color, so I'm not sure if this isn't a cure without a disease, in a practical sense. And with all due respect, you're the only person I've ever heard bring race into the equation regarding Progressive Rock, whether online or irl. I don't think there's this great Prog racist groundswell, but maybe I'm just missing it. I've never once seen anyone say that "all Prog-Rock artists are white" or "all Prog-Rock artists come from the UK." Maybe you have, but from here it seems like you're fighting a phantom.
    "If you want to see the true nature of humanity, just look at the internet."

    http://www.discogs.com/user/moecurlythanu/collection

  8. #208
    Quote Originally Posted by MYSTERIOUS TRAVELLER View Post
    the exclusion is the problem
    The only band I'd really exclude from you "Prog" list is Chicago, and last time I checked there were no people of color in Chicago. So what are you on about? Where in this thread is anyone saying what you are accusing them of saying? I love a lot of what you say and I respect a lot of your knowledge, but this issue is getting old, and you bring it up in thread after thread. Do us all a favor and give it a rest, huh? Or be specific about exactly who you are talking to, because I just don't see it in this thread.

    Bill

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •