Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 55 of 55

Thread: Is This Progressive?

  1. #51
    Because someone had to:

    Confirmed Bachelors: the dramedy hit of 1883...

  2. #52
    Member Since: 3/27/2002 MYSTERIOUS TRAVELLER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    The Kingdom of YHVH
    Posts
    2,770
    I love that Tango!
    I've danced to it many times


    Quote Originally Posted by Progbear View Post
    Because someone had to:

    Why is it whenever someone mentions an artist that was clearly progressive (yet not the Symph weenie definition of Prog) do certain people feel compelled to snort "thats not Prog" like a whiny 5th grader?

  3. #53
    Quote Originally Posted by TCC View Post
    Don't understand you
    It's Ok. Now that I'm back at work and see my own posts from the daily grind, I don't undertand them either.
    "Improvisation is not an excuse for musical laziness" - Fred Frith
    "[...] things that we never dreamed of doing in Crimson or in any band that I've been in," - Tony Levin speaking of SGM

  4. #54
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    59
    Nooooooooooo

  5. #55
    Member Steve F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Fluffy Cloud
    Posts
    5,656
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrotum Scissor View Post
    Geez; are Hyrrokkin (themselves) already gone?!
    Here's what some of them are up to

    Steve F.

    www.waysidemusic.com
    www.cuneiformrecords.com

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    “Remember, if it doesn't say "Cuneiform," it's not prog!” - THE Jed Levin

    Any time any one speaks to me about any musical project, the one absolute given is "it will not make big money". [tip of the hat to HK]

    "Death to false 'support the scene' prog!"

    please add 'imo' wherever you like, to avoid offending those easily offended.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •