Having 200 (or 300 or 600) people show up for a niche event is completely great and a success, imo.
....and I would humbly add that if all of us involved with Progday listened to all the shit flung at us over the years, and not persevered regardless, the festival would have died years ago. You have to suffer people's opinions. It is their right to have them. They don't necessarily have to voice them (which they have a proclivity towards...). My preference, if I'm not interested, is to be quiet. But if people choose to offer an opinion, you have to be mellow about it. That is PR101.
But back to Progday...since the first one occurred a century ago, the original guy who put it together didn't have to suffer any negative feedback, since prog festivals were the equivalent of discovering the wheel. It was only later, when we who carried it on (I used to be on the band selection committee in addition to stage managing), had to listen to, uh, "feedback". Which, fortunately, was in general a source of hilarity for us.
Can't remember that guy's name...neo prog freak....but I remember when we announced the appearance of a certain band we were quite jazzed about, his response was "Kron? Who the fuck is Kron?". Hee hee, hee hee hee hee hee.
The long and short of my unnecessary chiming in is....if the guys running this fest believe in it and want to do it again (without losing their shirts, hopefully), I say more power to 'em. It's a quick, steep learning curve, and I can bet my bippy they learned plenty their first time out. BUT, they pulled it off, did they not, in the spirit of "the show must go on"?
You Progstock cats have my support. If you can do another one, fuckin' go for it. But be cool! Flies with honey, and all that.
And when booking bands and projecting attendance figures, cut it in half
Bookmarks