Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: AAJ Rediscovery Column: Five Classic ECM Titles in High Res

  1. #1

    AAJ Rediscovery Column: Five Classic ECM Titles in High Res

    Hi folks,
    As some of you know, a little over a year I began an on-again/off-again column, Rediscovery, where I look back at older albums that I'm rediscovering, thanks to my major sound system upgrade - including the best speakers I've ever heard/owned, from Tetra Speakers - in late 2015 as part of our home renovation. For my first column in some time, I'm examining five classic ECM titles that were reissued in high res [24/192] last year.

    ------------------------------




    If ever there were a label that deserved to have its catalog released in a high resolution format, it's Munich's ECM Records. Since its inception in 1969, the multiple award-winning record label headed by producer Manfred Eicher has truly redefined how, initially, jazz and improvised music recordings could--and, at least for some, perhaps should--sound. Attention to the minutest detail and creating albums of such pristine clarity that every layer is clearly audible--from the loudest roar to the softest decay--has garnered the label a reputation like no other...a reputation that has grown exponentially over the decades as the label has morphed from being largely a jazz label to one that now includes a sizeable classical/form-based catalog, as well as a plethora of releases that defy such easy categorization.

    In fact, along with its attention to sonic clarity, breadth and depth, ECM has always been a label intent on pushing the boundaries of what music can be, right from its inception. With Eicher at the helm the label has built a reputation, across a discography of well over a thousand recordings, for releasing music of such consistently high quality that it's one of but a few--and, truly, none of the others possess the longevity, discographical size and/or broad musical continuum--where fans buy new releases sight unseen/music unheard because of their intrinsic trust in the label. Even if the album is from an artist they've not heard before, chances are that once they've heard it most label fans will be glad they did...even if it's not necessarily something to which they'd have otherwise paid attention.

    It's also a label unprecedented in the lion's share of its releases being produced by a single person: Eicher. The subject of "The ECM Sound" and what it really means has been debated for almost as long as the label has been around. The certainties? There are no stock reverb settings; and the label has used so many studios and engineers over the decades that it isn't a particular room sound or the person manning the board alongside Eicher. The best and closest way to articulate what the ECM Sound is? A reflection of Eicher's musical aesthetic, which can be reduced to some minimal concepts like "less is more" and the value of space...along with an approach to producing records where every note, from its first--perhaps sharp, perhaps muted--appearance to its final fade to black, with every moment in between, as clear as a bell, even when buried deep in the mix.

    But even those descriptors are superficial, at best. What makes ECM recordings so recognizable is something far more complex; any attempts to reduce its qualities to simple terms invariably waylaid by the many easily identifiable exceptions. Those who have followed the label for decades (or even those who've come to it more recently) know some of the touchstones that help render an ECM album instantly recognizable (beyond the five seconds of silence that preface every album since the '90s); but what those touchstones actually are can be the subject of heated debate. An enigma, then, albeit one that is still, somehow, uniquely identifiable.

    Across the span of nearly five decades, ECM has released music in a variety of formats, from its original vinyl (and oh, how beautiful and clean were those early German pressings!) through the cassette tape years and, finally, into the digital world with the advent of CD. While there have been a very few exceptions, what's been remarkable about ECM is how well it weathered the early CD years and less than stellar analog-to-digital (and vice versa) conversion that was in its relative infancy, often resulting in albums that were clean, yes, but also brittle and lacking in warmth and depth. Indeed, when looking back at earlier recordings collected in the label's Old and New Masters Edition reissue box sets, such as 2013's Paul Motian, Charles Lloyd Quartets and Jack DeJohnette Special Edition boxes, it turns out that ECM has rarely remastered the original digital masters, unless music that has never before been released on CD is being included.

    Continue reading here...
    John Kelman
    Senior Contributor, All About Jazz since 2004
    Freelance writer/photographer

  2. #2
    I have seen ECM recordings available on HDTracks. The issue I have is they are only 44.1/24, NOT 96/24 or higher as are most other hi-rez files. If they had one of Pat Metheny's better titles, I might be inclined to try one. The only other ECM artist I have any preference for is Steve Reich. Music For 18 Musicians would be a great test. As for Pat Metheny, American Garage, Still Life (Talking) or The Way Up would be ideal albums for release.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Jubal View Post
    I have seen ECM recordings available on HDTracks. The issue I have is they are only 44.1/24, NOT 96/24 or higher as are most other hi-rez files. If they had one of Pat Metheny's better titles, I might be inclined to try one. The only other ECM artist I have any preference for is Steve Reich. Music For 18 Musicians would be a great test. As for Pat Metheny, American Garage, Still Life (Talking) or The Way Up would be ideal albums for release.
    Not all are 24/44.1; it depends on what rate they were recorded. While these five at 24/192 are rare, I've many titles that are 24/96 or 24/88.2...with some, indeed, at 24/48 & 24/44.1.

    As I tried to explain in the article, however, I'd be cautious of being tied to a specific bit/sampling rate as what matters most is the actual mastering, and ECM is impeccable, whether 24/44.1 or 24/192. I'd aso beware of fallacies like 24/192 must sound twice as good as 24/96 (there are some who believe this, I'm told)

    I recently had a chance to sample the same music from a group in both 24/44.1 and 24/96. Interestingly, it bolstered my belief that bit-rate matters most, as that was where, when a/b'ing to the original CD, the biggest, most palpable difference could be heard...at least to my ears. From 24/44.1 to 24/96 was definitely more subtle.

    But either way (I must buy from ProStudioMasters as I'm in Canada) there are many recent ECM releases released at 24/88.2 or 24/96, so perhaps try those...or any of these five classics at 24/192.

    But, again, at the end of the day it depends on how they were recorded. Nguyên Lê recently told me that, for example, other than his last couple records (released in high res) there will be no more coming from his back catalog as they were all recorded at 16/44.1.

    Also, as a side note, The Way Up and Still Life are not ECM releases; originally on Geffen and Nonesuch respectively. But you can get Kin at 24/96 and it sounds wonderful. I'd very much like to see Pat's ECM output on ECM in high res....but not sure if it'll ever happen....
    Last edited by jkelman; 01-31-2017 at 10:49 AM.
    John Kelman
    Senior Contributor, All About Jazz since 2004
    Freelance writer/photographer

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •