Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 43

Thread: We call it Prog- But how do past and present artists discribe their music?

  1. #1
    Member StevegSr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Brexit Empire
    Posts
    91

    We call it Prog- But how do past and present artists discribe their music?

    Robert Fripp disowned the term Progressive Rock in the late eighties and nineties. Rick Wakeman and Dave Cousins embraced it. Some artists resented being classified with any tag.

    How do your favorite artists classify their music. Progressive Rock or not?
    Last edited by StevegSr; 02-22-2016 at 02:56 PM.
    To be or not to be? That is the point. - Harry Nilsson.

  2. #2
    None.
    "Improvisation is not an excuse for musical laziness" - Fred Frith
    "[...] things that we never dreamed of doing in Crimson or in any band that I've been in," - Tony Levin speaking of SGM

  3. #3
    Progga mogrooves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Past
    Posts
    1,900
    Hammill answers the question by saying that VdGG was an "underground" group.
    Hell, they ain't even old-timey ! - Homer Stokes

  4. #4
    Member StevegSr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Brexit Empire
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrotum Scissor View Post
    None.
    I never got into None Rock. Must be for jazz fans.
    To be or not to be? That is the point. - Harry Nilsson.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by StevegSr View Post
    I never got into None Rock. Must be for jazz fans.
    No. I'm not that much of an actual "jazz fan", although I admire much jazz for sure. In fact I've only got about 60-70 albums of bonafide jazz in my collection. Most of the remaining components are rock, folk and obscure marching bands' music. I Guess that asnwers Your initial question, though.

    Besides, PeterG will be here in a few minutes to rip this thread apart with the art of definite definitions. Pure poetry right there, see?
    Last edited by Scrotum Scissor; 02-20-2016 at 11:34 AM.
    "Improvisation is not an excuse for musical laziness" - Fred Frith
    "[...] things that we never dreamed of doing in Crimson or in any band that I've been in," - Tony Levin speaking of SGM

  6. #6
    Member StevegSr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Brexit Empire
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrotum Scissor View Post
    No. I'm not that much of an actual "jazz fan", although I admire much jazz for sure. In fact I've only got about 60-70 albums of bonafide jazz in my collection. Most of the remaining components are rock, folk and obscure marching bands' music. I Guess that asnwers Your initial question, though.

    Besides, PeterG will be here in a few minutes to rip this thread apart with the art of definite definitions. Pure poetry right there, see?
    Yes, I'd like to see him rip apart None Rock.
    To be or not to be? That is the point. - Harry Nilsson.

  7. #7
    Highly Evolved Orangutan JKL2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    16,608
    Steve Hogarth never really seems to accept the Prog mantle. Mark Kelly and Steve Rothery can't really deny it, having been in the band when it was called Silmarillion. Actually, I forget if Mark Kelly was in it when it was called Silmarillion or not, but since he was in Chemical Alice he still can't deny it.



    Probably no one in Pink Floyd would ever admit it, but since they did a song about a gnome...

    Let he who is without widdley cast the first stone.

  8. #8
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    32S 116E
    Posts
    0
    Steven Wilson used to dislike the label "progressive rock" being applied to Porcupine Tree, as he felt the term had come to denote a fairly specific type of rock music, implying that it needed to sound like Genesis, Yes, or Pink Floyd. Later on however he became more comfortable with it when it started to get applied to bands like Radiohead, who Wilson thought were genuinely progressive as opposed to recycling the sounds of the early 1970's.

    He has however said that he always thought of Porcupine Tree simply as a "rock band".

  9. #9
    Member moecurlythanu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    The Planet Lovetron
    Posts
    13,083
    Quote Originally Posted by bob_32_116 View Post
    Steven Wilson used to dislike the label "progressive rock" being applied to Porcupine Tree, as he felt the term had come to denote a fairly specific type of rock music, implying that it needed to sound like Genesis, Yes, or Pink Floyd.
    Strange, because they did sound like Pink Floyd.

  10. #10
    cunning linguist 3LockBox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    hiding out in treetops, shouting out rude names
    Posts
    3,680
    You call it prog. We call it maze.

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Serbia
    Posts
    1,882
    Quote Originally Posted by StevegSr View Post
    (...)

    How do your favorite artists classify their music. Progressive Rock or not?
    R.M. Točak, the guitar virtuoso and leader of my favorite Yugo-prog band Smak, said in his 2015 interview that Smak's music was "just rock".













    Personally, I never cared how my favorite prog artists classified themselves; the classification belong to us, the fans.

  12. #12
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    32S 116E
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by moecurlythanu View Post
    Strange, because they did sound like Pink Floyd.
    Well, he admitted that in the early days there was maybe a bit too much overt Pink Floyd influence, and he regretted it later. That's probably why the term "progressive rock" embarrassed him a little.

  13. #13
    It's all a part of rock music.

    Except for the parts that might be better categorized as jazz.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bob_32_116 View Post
    Well, he admitted that in the early days there was maybe a bit too much overt Pink Floyd influence, and he regretted it later. That's probably why the term "progressive rock" embarrassed him a little.
    I think for the most part, the PF influences in Porcupine Tree were in the very early days. 'The Sky moves sideways' being the most glaringly blatant. After that, an occasional reference could be heard (such as on 'Time Flies'), but I don't know that I would resign PT's overall musical output as "sounding like" Pimk Floyd, per the original comment.

  15. #15
    Member moecurlythanu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    The Planet Lovetron
    Posts
    13,083
    Quote Originally Posted by Svetonio View Post
    R.M. Točak, the guitar virtuoso and leader of my favorite Yugo-prog band Smak, said in his 2015 interview that Smak's music was "just rock".
    A much better name than "Unjust Rock."

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by bob_32_116 View Post
    Steven Wilson






    "Improvisation is not an excuse for musical laziness" - Fred Frith
    "[...] things that we never dreamed of doing in Crimson or in any band that I've been in," - Tony Levin speaking of SGM

  17. #17
    All Things Must Pass spellbound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Eastern Sierra
    Posts
    3,131
    We call it Prog
    Say it plainly
    The human name
    Doesn't mean shit to a tree - Paul Kantner/Grace Slick
    We're trying to build a monument to show that we were here
    It won't be visible through the air
    And there won't be any shade to cool the monument to prove that we were here. - Gene Parsons, 1973

  18. #18
    Highly Evolved Orangutan JKL2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    16,608
    Quote Originally Posted by 3LockBox View Post
    You call it prog. We call it maze.
    "Mazola!"

  19. #19
    Steve Howe seems to have embraced the prog label rather warmly.

    What I've noticed over the years is a slight shift: in the '80s and '90s, prog was a "bad word" and so was often rejected by people who otherwise made proggy music but wanted to be commercially viable; however, now the 'stigma' is mostly gone, but I see progressive musicians rejecting the label because they don't want to be seen as retro or derivative.

  20. #20
    cunning linguist 3LockBox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    hiding out in treetops, shouting out rude names
    Posts
    3,680
    Quote Originally Posted by JKL2000 View Post
    "Mazola!"
    I did mispell maize though
    Compact Disk brought high fidelity to the masses and audiophiles will never forgive it for that

  21. #21
    Member StevegSr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Brexit Empire
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by 3LockBox View Post
    You call it prog. We call it maze.
    Yes, that Mazola commercial did pop into my head as I was typing up my post!
    To be or not to be? That is the point. - Harry Nilsson.

  22. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Re-deployed as of 22 July
    Posts
    0
    pop music
    underground
    art rock

    BTW, yesterday I came across an old "fusion" compilation from as recently as 1977, and the word fusion was nowhere to be found anywhere on the sleeve or the liner notes, however the album was called "Jazz Rock" and the term jazz rock appears several times in the liner notes.

    So, fusion, a new (ish) term?

  23. #23
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    32S 116E
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PeterG View Post
    pop music
    underground
    art rock

    BTW, yesterday I came across an old "fusion" compilation from as recently as 1977, and the word fusion was nowhere to be found anywhere on the sleeve or the liner notes, however the album was called "Jazz Rock" and the term jazz rock appears several times in the liner notes.

    So, fusion, a new (ish) term?
    From memory, I first started to hear the term "fusion" some time in the early 1980's.

  24. #24
    In an interview about 10 years ago, Steve Hackett used the term "permissive rock", in an effort to describe music that allows influences from: rock, classical, folk, jazz, world music, metal, etc.

    I actually quite like that. It describes the music to a large extent, without having the baggage of having to somehow live up to the notion that it has to "progress".

    Another good thing about that term, is it doesn't pigeon hole the music into any specific style, sound, or instrumentation.

    Bands as diverse as, Thinking Plague, Marillion, Dream Theater, The Contortionist, IQ, YES and so many other unique bands all fit under that umbrella.
    Last edited by simon moon; 02-21-2016 at 03:18 PM.
    And if there were a god, I think it very unlikely that he would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence - Russell

  25. #25
    Highly Evolved Orangutan JKL2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    16,608
    ^ Permissive Rock is a good one. We should start calling it Superior Rock. That'll really piss off critics.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •