Why is it whenever someone mentions an artist that was clearly progressive (yet not the Symph weenie definition of Prog) do certain people feel compelled to snort "thats not Prog" like a whiny 5th grader?
Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on progrock.com
https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-a...re-happy-hour/
Gordon Haskell - "You've got to keep the groove in your head and play a load of bollocks instead"
I blame Wynton, what was the question?
There are only 10 types of people in the World, those who understand binary and those that don't.
Take Led Zeppelin for example. Four guys who all were vital to the collective sound of the band. Certainly they were one of the greatest rock bands in history.
They were also slowly heading into progressive rock more and more as the years went by. They did this in a natural way as they improved as musicians.
Now suppose Jimmy Page was handed Pro Tools instead of handed Bonham, and Jones. He does need a singer so he finds Plant. He can save money because he doesn't need to pay the other guys. He doesn't need a drummer because he has samples or can use a different guy and use triggers to get the sound he wants. He digitally alters Plant's voice with pitch shifters and auto tune. They make records and don't find the need to tour. Maybe they tour a little with some other musicians who come and go.
The result? It's different, but Led Zeppelin doesn't happen. Physical Graffiti never happens… SRTS never happens.
The old way was a completely different approach and experience for both the band, and ultimately the listener.
Floyd's DSOTM doesn't happen. It would have become Roger Waters controlling the Pro Tools screen more than likely and come out more like his solo work.
Why don't we see bands working together as they did before? Because they don't have to. It's not necessary. However, necessity is often the mother of invention. The lack of digital editing certainly demands much more of the artists skill set.
The value of vinyl records is trumping that of CD's big time. Why? Because it is a tangible physical product, often made the old way that is connecting with the purchasing listener. Vinyl record stores are on the rise. CD only stores are nearly non existent. Will a flash drive of digital downloads of the complete Zeppelin catalog ever have the same value as the vinyl box set? Not likely, and there is a very good reason for this. Digital music is nearly worthless. It's too easily copied, the album cover art is non existent so it doesn't play into it. It's like walking into an art museum and snapping digital photos of all the art and those photos while recognizable on a computer screen are going to be worth little to nothing regardless of how well they are further digitally enhanced.
A lot of the vinyl today is being digitally recorded then pressed onto vinyl. That has little interest to most because they can just listen to the digital version and it sounds just as good without the clicks and pops of vinyl.
Will there be digital art museums in the future? "WOW! it's just incredible what they did in photoshop, just amazing! No different with music.
Any chance we can call the humane society and make him leave this dead horse alone?
Steve F.
www.waysidemusic.com
www.cuneiformrecords.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
“Remember, if it doesn't say "Cuneiform," it's not prog!” - THE Jed Levin
Any time any one speaks to me about any musical project, the one absolute given is "it will not make big money". [tip of the hat to HK]
"Death to false 'support the scene' prog!"
please add 'imo' wherever you like, to avoid offending those easily offended.
If it sounds good, who cares how it was done.
I think you are conflating two unrelated issues.
In one, Led Zeppelin exists only in Jimmy Page's head and the contributions from Bonzo, Robert and John in terms of working out the material and finalizing the songs are missing. That's not Led Zeppelin. That's "Jimmy Page's Led Zeppelin" at best, and not likely to approach the genius of the chemistry of those four.
In the other, you're indicating that digital files are "worthless" because they can be copied. That ignores the whole quality issue, and maybe throws out the baby with the bath water. Yes, the music industry missed the boat (a couple of times) by not controlling reproduction, and inadvertently allowing file sharing services to decrease the perceived value of music files. But that is not an indictment of digital recording, it's a stupidity in the front office.
Last edited by rcarlberg; 12-01-2015 at 03:06 PM.
I suppose without modern multitrack techniques Mike Oldfield wouldn't have recorded Tubular Bells.
Music was better when we were just banging on rocks. Better sound quality, better collaboration, and it was pure, man.
Music isn't about chops, or even about talent - it's about sound and the way that sound communicates to people. Mike Keneally
My progressive music site: https://pienemmatpurot.com/ Reviews in English: https://pienemmatpurot.com/in-english/
But is it good art?
from Ians phone
Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on progrock.com
https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-a...re-happy-hour/
Gordon Haskell - "You've got to keep the groove in your head and play a load of bollocks instead"
I blame Wynton, what was the question?
There are only 10 types of people in the World, those who understand binary and those that don't.
We do. TONS of them! It's just that nowadays, there's people making music on their own (utilizing the way you hate) in addition to those bands. And thanks to the Internet, everybody can put their stuff out there in hopes to get heard. There's just way more music out there than there ever has been. But a good deal of it is still bands... and they still get together to write, rehearse, record (even in the same room, playing together at the same time) and play out. I hate to break it to you and rain on your doom party, but the sky is NOT falling, Chicken Little.
Preach it, brother!
Y'know, my friend says it all went wrong when Edison came out with the wax cylinder. But I don't agree. It was never the same after they invented musical notation. I mean once you've written it all down on a piece of paper the music just doesn't sound natural any more.
What about robots playing the same room together? Does that count?
The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off
Music isn't about chops, or even about talent - it's about sound and the way that sound communicates to people. Mike Keneally
I think it's time someone posted this. Sing along with me if you know it. It can be our theme song, all of us together. Come and join the revolution!
<sig out of order>
That was Presence. He did all the overdubs in one marathon session. Keith Harwood was the engineer and apparently he and Page took turns waking each other up if one of them would fall asleep. The Stones were booked to use the studio next and Zep didn't have much time to wrap up the recording. Given the amount of guitar tracks on Achilles Last Stand it's either a testament to Page's willpower or the strength of the heroin available in Germany.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down.'- Bob Newhart
What a week it must have been for the dealer stocking that studio. First Zep, and then the Stones.
I don't like country music, but I don't mean to denigrate those who do. And for the people who like country music, denigrate means 'put down.'- Bob Newhart
Technology is a tool and so am I.
Mongrel dog soils actor's feet
Bookmarks