it is sad indeed that musicians can not make a living doing what they love these days
it is sad indeed that musicians can not make a living doing what they love these days
Why is it whenever someone mentions an artist that was clearly progressive (yet not the Symph weenie definition of Prog) do certain people feel compelled to snort "thats not Prog" like a whiny 5th grader?
I'm disappointed, as I expected he was referring to Progression magazine
BG
"When Yes appeared on stage, it was like, the gods appearing from the heavens, deigning to play in front of the people."
I'm amazed everyone missed the most jarring note of the OP: "Waters' words echo those spoken by Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons of Kiss." Reminds me of the time Frank Zappa & Donny Osmond teamed up to go toe-to-toe against Tipper Gore.
I've got a bike you can ride it if you like
^
"Improvisation is not an excuse for musical laziness" - Fred Frith
"[...] things that we never dreamed of doing in Crimson or in any band that I've been in," - Tony Levin speaking of SGM
When I read the threat title I could only picture this:
oldmanyellsatcloud-350.jpg
As some ancient Chinese philosopher once said "Just dig a hole that's deep enough, and everyone will want to jump into it."
Bad for Jimi, I guess but good for his legions of fans. We'd never have "Machine Gun" (that particular live version) if it wasn't for the contractual obligation. I've never been a big fan of live albums but BOG is my favorite live record of all time. At one time it was my favorite Hendrix album. Don't read this as if I'm defending those scum-sucking, corporate swine (the record bizz), I'm just saying that for an album that was a quicky, live, contractual obligation, Jimi produced one HELL of a live record.c) The Band of Gypsys album exists largely because Hendrix signed a contract in 1966 and the people who owned the contract demanded he fulfill it. All those horrible albums released after he died with session musician overdubs are a direct result of his business affairs being a disaster.
Yeah what could he know about it.
Of course, not being of the daily persuasion in this opinion laden public prog bathhouse, my diatribe of recent lucubration is perhaps as welcome as a rats teat. One often is forced to weigh the desire to flash judgment within against the effort required as well as the value this knowledge will be to the greater good of all mankind or whatever inhabits the current spa. At best, its a slippery slope.
Amazing music is being made right now all over the world.
I don't want to come across as negative, especially because I am at peace with the fact that I will not ever be making a living from music. However, it occurs to me that the "lucky" artists who did so well in their own eras either show no concern for current artists' plight, or (like Roger Waters and the KISS gents) lament the current state but offer no alternative models. The only artists with $$$ that I see trying to "fix the system" are only addressing their own revenue streams (e.g., Jay-Z et al's Tidal), with no mechanism to support the yet-to-be established artists. It's like saying, "Glad I'M not homeless," as you walk past a starving man while you chomp down on a footlong hoagie.
So typical of Roger – he’s always looking for things to complain about. Why doesn’t he take comfort in the fact that PewDiePie earns $4 million dollars a year with his youtube channel instead?
If you’re any good, you’ll make your millions. Look at Katy Perry. Find a positive role-model. If those Cuneiform “artist” (translation: losers) got off their asses and bothered to write actual songs with real melodies and decent beats, they’d be partying on a yacht too. Complain’ ain’t changin’
"Dem Glücklichen legt auch der Hahn ein Ei."
The writing has been on the wall for a long time. I think a lot of the artists getting boned over their cut of things have some responsibility to recognize that it isnt like it used to be. I dont think you can rely on a label in the same way now - and you need to be independent to an extent with your craft. There are lots of ways to market yourself and your music now (free too!). Its why I use bandcamp more than any other site for discovering and buying music now. The artists (as I understand it) at least get a decent cut of the money. Trying to fit a square into a round paradigm now is basically gonna strangle you. Roger can be a good mouthpiece and people will notice because he is a large scale figure in this business... if he sheds light on an obvious problem - more power to him and people to take it in. The shift is happening now and tech is driving a huge pile of crazy at the moment.
last month I saw Billy Cobham and he mentioned the CDs that they had for sale after the show saying 'On the CDs is just us 4 you see right here. We are now the record company'
I thought it was cool and bought a CD, but I sure hope he's making more than just the money from the 25-50 CDs he sells each night on the tour
Why is it whenever someone mentions an artist that was clearly progressive (yet not the Symph weenie definition of Prog) do certain people feel compelled to snort "thats not Prog" like a whiny 5th grader?
Don't you think the bar has been lowered though?
One can make insanely complex music now without even picking up an instrument and have it sound perfect to untrained ears. So therefore, no one cares anymore because it's a given now. 30 or 40 years ago, you could impress people with great music, now it's a yawn.
Recording music professionally used to be a real art in and of itself. Just because you are Billy Cobham, doesn't mean you know how to make a recording that can really move a person emotionally. All the modern gizmos make editing and fixing things a breeze, but there is more to it than that. A lot of great music was made before computers got involved.
"Improvisation is not an excuse for musical laziness" - Fred Frith
"[...] things that we never dreamed of doing in Crimson or in any band that I've been in," - Tony Levin speaking of SGM
Bookmarks