Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 104

Thread: The appeal of Rick Wakeman

  1. #26
    Member 2steves's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    NYC and RBK, NY
    Posts
    206
    Quote Originally Posted by Man In The Mountain View Post
    His style. When you hear him play, or hear one of his songs, you can easily recognize it's Rick who is playing. Not many keyboard players are as recognizable as Rick.

    In general, I find his music to be FUN, extremely melodic, and chuck-full of keyboard instrumentation. Often, the cheeser the better. I just want to hear him play goopy sounding keyboards. He's also extremely prolific, and you have to sift through everything to find what you like. I have given up on him several times, only to turn around and find a new one that's pretty great.

    I get it though, his music tends to lack anything else interesting about it. There's nothing deep about his music. At all. The guitars and drums are fairly ordinary, and the singers are often odd or unappealing, the lyrics are just plain dumb. Nobody in his bands are ever as flashy as Rick Himself, except when he's in YES. So, if you're not a keyboard player, or a keyboard fan, the music may hold little interest for you.
    Very correct about his style---Bruford said what interested him about Rick's playing is there's not a lot of blue notes in him---unusual for a lot of players. And his solo's when good are like no other players solo's.

  2. #27
    He really did take Yes to the next level, in my mind. And he's a funny, funny bastard. But like many here I'm all set with most of his solo stuff.

  3. #28
    Member since March 2004 mozo-pg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    9,861
    He played on Close To The Edge.

  4. #29
    Member WytchCrypt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Greater Seattle Area
    Posts
    32
    Well, to be honest Wakeman has never been one of my favorite keyboard players and other than a few sections of Journey his solo stuff does nothing for me so it's not that...with Yes though, he really was a quantum leap forward from Tony Kaye. I don't think Yes would have been nearly as big as they became in the 70's without him and it would be hard to imagine CttE or Tales with a keyboardist who didn't want to play synth
    Check out my solo project prog band, Mutiny in Jonestown at https://mutinyinjonestown.bandcamp.com/

    Check out my solo project progressive doom metal band, WytchCrypt at https://wytchcrypt.bandcamp.com/


  5. #30
    Outside of YES, Rick always seems to select singers who are half a step above Steve Howe if he were a true lead-singer. ;-)

    I also like when he plays in a cape. :-)

    I love Rick and many ways. Will get back to this after dinner sometime later this evening.

  6. #31
    His long blonde hair?.. Seriously.. he did personify the 70's with his cape / hair etc. didn't he? And a damn good keyboard player to boot! He has so many solo albums I wouldn't begin to know where to rank them.. Still contend his "Excerpt" from Yessongs was his best solo effort.... With that said.. both Criminal Record / White Rock have some nice stuff on them.. and I even like a few selections from Rhapsodies

  7. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Iowa City IA
    Posts
    2,451
    Sometimes I just need some proggy schlock and bombast, you know? And when that mood hits, nothing scratches the itch better than Rick's solo oeuvre...

  8. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Homburg View Post
    What is the appeal of Rick Wakeman's music?
    Beyond Six Wives (which was a superb instrumental prog album, but I think it promised more than Rick was, in the end, able to deliver), there really wasn’t much. Well, his live shows back in the day were apparently quite the flashy visual extravaganza, so he was at least entertaining to watch (though he never really recovered from the King Arthur on Ice debacle, to say nothing of Lisztomania*).

    *though Ken Russell must shoulder the lion’s share of the blame for this one. A similar career path as Rick’s: one excellent feature film in Women in Love and lots of cheesy, excessive (yet oddly compelling and entertaining) glop from then on.
    Confirmed Bachelors: the dramedy hit of 1883...

  9. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by ronmac View Post
    I would say the one thing that tends to drag his work down is his puzzling choice of vocalists. That being said, his material can't be sung by just anyone. It really requires a wide range and an ability to properly phrase the material.
    I actually rather liked Gary Pickford-Hopkins (or whatever his name is) and thought he should have been the sole vocalist on Journey and Arthur. Ashley Holt, though...he’s perhaps not as awful as many would have you believe but still, he is...not good.

    Quote Originally Posted by Reginod View Post
    To me the most remarkable thing about Wakeman is how prolific he's been, averaging almost two albums released per year going back to 1973.
    Nobody has mentioned the reason for his prolific nature: apparently A&M completely screwed him over, giving him a pittance in royalties for his big-selling albums. He’s basically been forced to release 2+ albums a year just to keep his head above water.
    Confirmed Bachelors: the dramedy hit of 1883...

  10. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    421
    Quote Originally Posted by trurl View Post
    Generally, when talking about his solo output- not much. He's surprisingly unimaginative as a writer.
    I agree...except that it is surprising. Not every great player is a great (or even good) composer.

    I do like parts of Six Wives, and the re-recorded version of Journey to the Centre of the Earth has me liking an album that initially failed to impress me.

  11. #36
    He took YES to a higher level.

  12. #37
    Member Since: 3/27/2002 MYSTERIOUS TRAVELLER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    The Kingdom of YHVH
    Posts
    2,770
    People like him because he was in a band called Yes. So, the real question here would be "What's the appeal of Yes' music?" and I could not answer that question since I don't find it all that appealing... well... it's better than Genesis and VDGG but that's not saying much. All the other Brit Symph bands are better to my ears

    Honestly, Six Wives is a lot more enjoyable to me than any Yes album.
    Why is it whenever someone mentions an artist that was clearly progressive (yet not the Symph weenie definition of Prog) do certain people feel compelled to snort "thats not Prog" like a whiny 5th grader?

  13. #38
    Member Oreb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    80
    I enjoy the first three quite a bit. Strong on big, highly melodic prog without ever becoming too challenging or straying too far from pop music.

    It was that pop sensibility, matched with the ornate packaging of Journey and Arthur, that made them huge at the time IMO.

    Does it matter that this waste of time is what makes a life for you?

  14. #39
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    32S 116E
    Posts
    0
    I never quite got my head around 1984. Chaka Khan is a great vocalist, but it just seemed like such a total mismatch.

  15. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    0
    When Rick consults his spiritual/religious muse, his efforts can be astonishing, particularly on the pipe organ. I never tire of listening to Judas Iscariot, Awaken or his other more ethereal works. I love his Dante Period/Hell piece on Lisztomania as well. These pieces evoke a tragic sadness that captures me. His portraits of evil are indeed dark, while his lighter happier stuff does not evoke the same appeal...

  16. #41
    Member Oreb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    80
    Quote Originally Posted by bob_32_116 View Post
    I never quite got my head around 1984. Chaka Khan is a great vocalist, but it just seemed like such a total mismatch.
    Rick's pretty critical of it, but IMO it's a very strong album.

    The Tim Rice lyrics are good as well - about the only time in his career (Dave Cousens excepted) that he worked with a good lyricist.

    Does it matter that this waste of time is what makes a life for you?

  17. #42
    Member Man In The Mountain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Chicago area
    Posts
    1,070
    He made better solo albums than Patrick Moraz, everyone's favored Yes keyboardist. Rick even made better solo albums than Keith Emerson.

    Rick is everyone's favorite keyboard pin cushion, totally undeserved. I think it must have it's roots in Tormato.

  18. #43
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    32S 116E
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Man In The Mountain View Post

    Rick is everyone's favorite keyboard pin cushion, totally undeserved. I think it must have it's roots in Tormato.
    Is he? I guess it depends on the circles in which you move. I don't think I've ever hard anything but praise for Rick's work in Yes. I would say his reputation was made way before Tormato.

  19. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by ronmac View Post
    I love King Arthur. It gets slammed here an awful lot by those who view it retrospectively, instead of through the prism of the times. He could never release something like that today and be taken seriously. Back then, it was entirely appropriate, IMO.

    I would say the one thing that tends to drag his work down is his puzzling choice of vocalists. That being said, his material can't be sung by just anyone. It really requires a wide range and an ability to properly phrase the material.
    Well said.

  20. #45
    Quote Originally Posted by Progbear View Post



    Nobody has mentioned the reason for his prolific nature: apparently A&M completely screwed him over, giving him a pittance in royalties for his big-selling albums. He’s basically been forced to release 2+ albums a year just to keep his head above water.
    While this is a shame.. I find it hard to believe his fan base has continued to buy the majority of his releases.. how does he stay above water other than his Yes royalties? I know in his book Just say Yes he was ecstatic when Jon called about the ABWH sessions.. he was one hurting pup at that point financially.. and obviously the Union tour didn't hurt either..

  21. #46
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia Area
    Posts
    1,805
    I really enjoy Six Wives, Journey, Arthur, No Earthly Connection, White Rock and Criminal Record. I find Judas Iscariot to be perhaps one of the best pieces of prog music written. It's mesmerizing. Much of the rest of his output has little to no interest to me.

  22. #47
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Florida (temporarily)
    Posts
    674
    To try to answer the original question, it seems to me that Wakeman is a musician to Americans and a personality to the British. Most British people could identify him by his voice but hardly any Americans could. To us, his appeal is his music. To them, though, I think it is his television appearances.

  23. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by llanwydd View Post
    To us, his appeal is his music. To them, though, I think it is his television appearances.
    Here in mainland Europe, Wakeman's music (i.e. compositions/releases/"works") has been a point of outright ridicule even since the mid-70s. In the annales of musicology, his "approach" - if that's what it forms - is interpreted not as rock but as definite "crossover" antics and aesthetics - a phenomenon which is still loathed within musical academia.

    During my decades as a progressive rock fan, I can remember one - 1 - single person who defined himself as an actual fan of Wakeman's compositional "achievements". Still I knew several who admired his style, although his technique and that purpoted "virtuosity" was often described as overrated by many piano majors I spoke with. I particularly remember a trained pianist and art academic I myself was working with in a band during the early 90s, who stated that he really dug Wakeman for his showmanship, sense of energy and ambition, but that the alleged elitist talents of the man were little but a delusion to the uneducated ear. And the guy duly sat down at his rack and demonstrated this by playing and explaining things from Wakeman's discography, never deriding it yet still exposing its trickery and levels of appearance.

    Wakeman is still rather entertaining and funny though.
    "Improvisation is not an excuse for musical laziness" - Fred Frith
    "[...] things that we never dreamed of doing in Crimson or in any band that I've been in," - Tony Levin speaking of SGM

  24. #49
    To me, Fragile and Close to the Edge are outstanding, but I agree with Wakeman about Tropographical and only listen to "Ritual". I like Going for the One but Tormato, not so much. My problem was on Keys. When I first heard it, I laughed "And here comes Rick Wakeman!" The keys on Keys stick out too much for me, I guess.

    But I wasn't aware until this year how funny he is! Can someone link what he said about his DUI? Thanks

  25. #50
    I just watched the last 45 minutes of "King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table" (1953) on TCM starring an incredibly monotonous Robert Taylor. That movie could really have used Rick's music. I mean that seriously.
    "The White Zone is for loading and unloading only. If you got to load or unload go to the White Zone!"

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •