View Full Version : Roundtable Discussion: Were the Rolling Stones Better in the '60s or the '70s?
starless and bible black
08-21-2020, 05:53 AM
From Ultimate Classic Rock.com:
The Rolling Stones have gone through many phases on their way to becoming one of the biggest bands in rock history. From the start they were seen as an edgier alternative to the Beatles, focusing on American blues music. But they soon expanded their musical horizons, embracing everything from R&B to pop to psychedelia.
The band released much of its landmark work in a milestone run that spanned the late 60s through the mid-70s, and which included such vaunted releases as Beggars Banquet (1968), Let It Bleed (1969), Sticky Fingers (1971) and Exile on Main St. (1972).
Read More: Were the Rolling Stones Better in the '60s or '70s? Roundtable | https://ultimateclassicrock.com/rolling-stones-60s-70s-roundtable/?utm_source=tsmclip&utm_medium=referral
Zeuhlmate
08-21-2020, 06:25 AM
I think there is another thread on this subject allready...
Anyway - I stopped listening to them after Let It Bleed.
Before that they made many quite interesting tunes, possibly due to Brian Jones influence?
Vic2012
08-21-2020, 09:20 AM
I think they were good in both decades, and the 80s.
Rarebird
08-21-2020, 01:31 PM
They never were as good as The Beatles ;)
nycsteve
08-21-2020, 06:50 PM
70s for sure.
Mythos
08-22-2020, 01:14 AM
60's for sure...
Trane
08-22-2020, 06:46 AM
From 65 (songs like Heart Of Stone, Get Off My Cloud, Paint It Black, Mother's Little Helper, etc...) until 78 (last good album is Some Girls)
mozo-pg
08-22-2020, 06:15 PM
70s for sure
60's for sure...
For sure. They had a great five album run starting in 1966, but got pretty spotty after Exile.
Vic2012
08-22-2020, 06:56 PM
Exile[/I].
Baloney.....:)
Mister Triscuits
08-22-2020, 08:59 PM
They had a great five album run starting in 1966, but got pretty spotty after Exile.
Only five? I make it a seven-album run from Aftermath through Exiles, and that's not counting Flowers or the live albums (one of which is fairly execrable, the other one of the greatest live albums in rock music history). But you really have to start peak Stones from 1965 and the run of killer singles starting with "Satisfaction." From '73 on it was all "It's good, but it's no Beggars Banquet."
BravadoNJ
08-22-2020, 09:14 PM
...is that reference to the years or their ages? :cool
starless and bible black
08-23-2020, 06:18 AM
I say The Stones were at their best in their studio albums & hit singles from the mid '60s thru the early '70s. There would be some good LPs (Some Girls & Tattoo You) after that peak.
Facelift
08-23-2020, 02:28 PM
Depends on how you look at the question. I think they were "better in the '70s" in that they made what I consider to be their best 2 albums in the '70s, but as a body of work, the 60s were better.
Only five? I make it a seven-album run from Aftermath through Exiles, and that's not counting Flowers or the live albums (one of which is fairly execrable, the other one of the greatest live albums in rock music history). But you really have to start peak Stones from 1965 and the run of killer singles starting with "Satisfaction." From '73 on it was all "It's good, but it's no Beggars Banquet."
Yeah, I meant 5 in the 60s. Didn't word that very well.
It's not as clear cut as that. Really their first decade as recording artists- so 1963-73- was their best. I have a lot more time for Goats Head Soup than some fans (and the tour which accompanied it was perhaps their best as a live act). It's Only Rock N Roll, not so much...that was the first album where I sense they are coasting. Although I still like half of it.
Vic2012
08-23-2020, 04:20 PM
I like these two very much:
Black and Blue (1976)
Dirty Work (1988). It's better than Steel Wheels.
Not being contrarian, I really like those albums.
Facelift
08-23-2020, 04:26 PM
I like these two very much:
Black and Blue (1976)
Dirty Work (1988). It's better than Steel Wheels.
Not being contrarian, I really like those albums.
Dirty Work was 1985, but I agree that it's better than most think.
I also really like Bridges to Babylon - I think it's their best album of new material since Some Girls.
Vic2012
08-23-2020, 04:33 PM
Dirty Work was 1985, but I agree that it's better than most think.
I also really like Bridges to Babylon - I think it's their best album of new material since Some Girls.
Wikipedia says Dirty Work is from 1986. Whatever, I agree that it's marginalized. It's just a good Rock n Roll album. It's not heavy metal, glam, or any of that. It's only rock and roll (another Stones album that isn't too shabby).
The Dark Elf
08-23-2020, 04:45 PM
From Ultimate Classic Rock.com:
The Rolling Stones have gone through many phases on their way to becoming one of the biggest bands in rock history. From the start they were seen as an edgier alternative to the Beatles, focusing on American blues music. But they soon expanded their musical horizons, embracing everything from R&B to pop to psychedelia.
The band released much of its landmark work in a milestone run that spanned the late ‘60s through the mid-’70s, and which included such vaunted releases as Beggars Banquet (1968), Let It Bleed (1969), Sticky Fingers (1971) and Exile on Main St. (1972).
Actually, you pretty much summed it up in your last sentence. The five years of any consequence for The Stones was during the period Beggars Banquet (1968), Let It Bleed (1969), the superior live album Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out (1970), Sticky Fingers (1971) and Exile on Main St. (1972) were released. That's about it for me.
Trane
08-23-2020, 05:57 PM
I like these two very much:
Black and Blue (1976)
Dirty Work (1988).Dirty Work was 1985, but I agree that it's better than most think.
Wikipedia says Dirty Work is from 1986. Whatever, I agree that it's marginalized. It's just a good Rock n Roll album. It's not heavy metal, glam, or any of that. It's only rock and roll (another Stones album that isn't too shabby).
I agree that both B&B and DW (the best post SG album, IMHO) are good but totally underated Stones albums
Maybe it's the reggae thing that probably repells some of the fans
^Well, not really. Both albums have one reggae track each.
Black And Blue is not bad (and on a technical level, one of their best sounding albums) but the cover of 'Cherry Oh Baby' is a dud IMHO. Not as good as the original. The rest of the album is better.
'Too Rude' is one of the best tracks on Dirty Work. But there's some really ropey tracks like 'Back To Zero' and 'Winning Ugly' on there which are more like dated Jagger solo tracks. And for too much of that album Jagger snarls rather than sings...'Fight' in particular suffers from that.
I should say that I never really thought much of their first single, the cover of Chuck Berry's 'Come On'. It's pretty tame. The BBC session version is better- it doesn't have that clunky key change and has a brief guitar solo. Maybe they were asked to make it more 'pop' for the record, I don't know.
Vic2012
08-23-2020, 07:38 PM
Just played Dirty Work, the whole record. It has its 80s sound on some tracks but overall it is a good Stones album. It's just a good R&R record.
Some Girls thru Emotional Rescue was their peak...
Trane
08-24-2020, 02:57 AM
^Well, not really. Both albums have one reggae track each.
Black And Blue is not bad (and on a technical level, one of their best sounding albums) but the cover of 'Cherry Oh Baby' is a dud IMHO. Not as good as the original. The rest of the album is better.
'Too Rude' is one of the best tracks on Dirty Work. But there's some really ropey tracks like 'Back To Zero' and 'Winning Ugly' on there which are more like dated Jagger solo tracks. And for too much of that album Jagger snarls rather than sings...'Fight' in particular suffers from that.
well I count two for those albums:
Hot Stuff & Cherry Baby on B&B
Too Rude and Back To Zero (which funk-reggae)
and Beast of Burden on Some Girls.
Funny how the memory works: I could've sworn there was a third one of DW
anyways, happy to have revisited those to albums
Some Girls thru Emotional Rescue was their peak...
you do know they're consecutive albums, do you? ;)
TBH, I've always thought of Rescue horrendous really!! the first of a series of album which I wouldn't even bring home, even as second-hand. The only exception I made since Some Girls is Dirty Work.
'Hot Stuff' and 'Back To Zero' are more funk-influenced, not reggae really IMHO. Richards was the main reggae fan in the band, I think.
Emotional Rescue has some good tracks (especially towards the end) but also some poor ones like 'Where The Boys Go'. It's funny, you'd think Emotional Rescue was the leftovers album rather than Tattoo You!
Jerjo
08-24-2020, 06:09 AM
OK, insomnia has taken hold so I might as well go for an epic post here. Sit tight, this is going to be worthy of Guitargeek. In fact, I am certain JJ88, Guitargeek, and Adm.Kirk will have much to say on this topic as well. The last several years I have been doing a ridiculous amount of reading on some classic bands and I just finished Keith's book not that long ago (he remembers more than you think he would, he doesn't dodge the drugs issue but he ignores the ramifications of it, and he spends WAY too much time whining about Jagger).
60s vs 70s is not really where to divide the Stones, because that famed four album peak straddles 68-72. Like any of the bigger acts of the rock era, the Rolling Stones went through several distinct periods. A better way to split them would be by the second guitarist. Then it makes more sense (though making sense of what the Stones went through will give you a contact high).
Brian Jones (inception up towards Beggars Banquet). This is what many think of as the 60s Stones. First as a tight R&B/blues unit, morphed into a darker sunshine pop band (try Aftermath, the best album of that era, it's brilliant) and then slid into a psychedelic miasma with Their Satanic Majesties Request. Brian was crucial in two ways. First, while he couldn't write a song to save his life but he could add all these instrumental touches that would make a Jagger/Richards single come alive. Like the sitar on Paint it Black. Second, he would weave his lead lines in with Keith's. This is the sound that Keith prefers for the Stones - two guitars going back and forth. There are a ridiculous amount of classic songs that came out of this era. Mick and Keith figured out how to write songs while Andrew Loog Oldham fashioned himself a sort of George Martin (but he wasn't). Brian was falling apart by Satanic and the band had it up to here with his bullshit. Massive amounts of drugs, undependable onstage and in the studio, when he wasn't beating women he was knocking them up, etc. The Glimmer Twins wrote a new single based on a riff Keith recorded on an acoustic guitar into a cassette player and then overdrove the cassette playback. That was "Jumpin' Jack Flash" and it had nothing to do with what came before.
Mick Taylor (Beggars Banquet through It's Only Rock n Roll). Taylor wasn't on Beggars Banquet but then again, Brian only makes a brief appearance as he staggered into irrelevance. But this is arguably the Stones peak era, beginning with the aforementioned "Jumping Jack Flash" single and then four classic studio albums with Jimmy Miller as producer (heroin took him out of the game - what a shock). This was Richards shutting down the pop and going to his strengths. All those early years of listening and studying American music: blues, R&B, country, gospel, 50s rock got regurgitated into this dark embrace with Jagger's lyrics. Shit got real. Keith also got into heroin which ultimately took that riff factory and killed the flow to a trickle. Taylor didn't get much credit for writing though he certainly should have for "Winter", "Moonlight Mile", "Time Waits for No One", and "Can't You Hear Me Knocking". The fluid melodies of those tunes sure as hell ain't Keith. Taylor could stand toe to toe with the Brit blues guitar gods of that era. Listen to the famed Brussels Affair and you'll hear a guy just throwing down fire and lightning. The other thing about this era is that Taylor and Keith were playing Gibsons, through overdriven amps that resulted in a really thick, almost hard rock sound. These guitars are the hounds of hell, which is perfect for Mick's lyrics of that era. But Keith was using heroic amounts of heroin and coke (though he was very precise about his doses, hence he never died of an OD) and the riff train petered out by Goats Head Soup and It's Only Rock n' Roll (the title track of which was borrowed/stolen from Ronnie Wood). There's some great tunes on those two albums but some absolute shite as well. But that four album run of Beggars through Exile is a singular achievement.
Ronnie Wood (Black n Blue through present) If the previous era was "shit got real", this was "peaks are intermittent". Woody was not the wunderkind that Taylor was on guitar (but then again, few were). But he was drugged out and happy to be along for the ride, not battling the two big egos in the band (despite his protests, Keith is as much of a pain in the ass as Mick can be). The guitars weave again, but now it's pretty much all Fenders and the ferocious roar that Taylor/Richards had was gone. Instead its this thinner treble melange that is fine for rock n' roll but its a matter of taste. But the highlights are arguable because often it was left to Mick to piece an album together with his guitarists too wasted to really finish the job. Black n Blue was a collection of songs recorded with different guitar players, trying to find the next Taylor. Woody was on three tracks, most notably "Crazy Mama". But like the two albums before it, rife with filler. Some Girls was indeed a return to form. That record is mean. Even the bonus disc that came out a few years ago has some solid, nasty work (it leads with a rocker dedicated to Claudine Longet after she killed Spider Sabich - it's not complementary). It had the big dance single but just lots of nasty rock n' roll (but not RAWK, they got off that wagon). Emotional Rescue is a bit of a come down but some of it works. Tattoo You was the result of Mick deciding to dig up what was laying around from studio outtakes from as far back as Exile and he put it together with Mick Taylor. Damned if it didn't work and the tour was the stuff of legend. But they didn't play that together for quite a number of years after. The Stones are all over the place from then on. Slick studio albums with sometimes Keith participating, sometimes not so much. He and Mick were really hating each other into the early 90s, and he's pretty honest about it in the book. One can argue about all the albums in the Wood era over what's good, great, or just sucks. Everyone's opinion differs. Some die hards insist it was all good, haters say it all sucked. Woody eventually cleaned up his act so the live shit around the end of the 90s until Keith fell out of a tree has some pretty impressive guitar weaving. Blue and Lonesome is just a kickass blues album.
I think Aftermath is the first great album they made and it's often overlooked now. That was the first one which was entirely self-penned and the first example of them stretching out beyond R&B. I would have included a couple of the great songs from the sessions like 'Sitting On A Fence' and 'Ride On Baby' instead of lesser tracks such as 'What To Do'. But it's a classic album to me.
As for Brian Jones, a great musician who added enormously to their sound in that mid 60s period. But the personal issues became overwhelming...I remember even Charlie Watts saying he 'wasn't very nice'.
To be honest, I think they'd run their course with Taylor anyway when he left. The lifestyle had taken its toll on him and It's Only Rock N Roll wasn't a great album. So Wood joining made sense, and I believe Some Girls/Tattoo You were two of their biggest selling albums.
The studio output is undeniably patchier after Tattoo You. The fracture within the band is very evident on Undercover and Dirty Work- arguably their weakest albums IMHO. I like most of Steel Wheels and Voodoo Lounge.
I think Wood's solo album I've Got My Own Album To Do is the best solo album by any of them. Even though it's before he actually joined, Jagger and Richards are on it. I love the overall feel of that album.
spacefreak
08-24-2020, 08:59 AM
From 65 (songs like Heart Of Stone, Get Off My Cloud, Paint It Black, Mother's Little Helper, etc...) until 78 (last good album is Some Girls)
I share exactly the same opinion.
starless and bible black
08-24-2020, 10:11 AM
I think Aftermath is the first great album they made and it's often overlooked now. That was the first one which was entirely self-penned and the first example of them stretching out beyond R&B. I would have included a couple of the great songs from the sessions like 'Sitting On A Fence' and 'Ride On Baby' instead of lesser tracks such as 'What To Do'. But it's a classic album to me.
As for Brian Jones, a great musician who added enormously to their sound in that mid 60s period. But the personal issues became overwhelming...I remember even Charlie Watts saying he 'wasn't very nice'.
To be honest, I think they'd run their course with Taylor anyway when he left. The lifestyle had taken its toll on him and It's Only Rock N Roll wasn't a great album. So Wood joining made sense, and I believe Some Girls/Tattoo You were two of their biggest selling albums.
The studio output is undeniably patchier after Tattoo You. The fracture within the band is very evident on Undercover and Dirty Work- arguably their weakest albums IMHO. I like most of Steel Wheels and Voodoo Lounge.
I think Wood's solo album I've Got My Own Album To Do is the best solo album by any of them. Even though it's before he actually joined, Jagger and Richards are on it. I love the overall feel of that album.
I agree; Aftermath is the first great Stones album (and one of my favorites). I also like the follow up, Between The Buttons. While the production on that LP could be much better, there's a lot of great songs on it (like "Complicated", "Miss Amanda Jones", "Connection" not to mention "Let's Spend The Night Together" & "Ruby Tuesday" on the American version of BTB).
Between The Buttons is a weird one for me. I can't think of an album they made which rocked less! It really feels like there's something missing, production-wise- not much grit. 'Yesterday's Papers' and 'Back Street Girl' are classic tracks though, again in that baroque-pop mode, which they were brilliant at.
I listen to the first three UK albums a fair bit. I don't think any are 'classic' as albums but there's some great covers on them. The UK Out Of Our Heads especially, with the great one-two punch opener, 'She Said Yeah' and 'Mercy Mercy'.
Guitarplyrjvb
08-24-2020, 03:37 PM
I agree with rating them by their second guitarist. The Mick Taylor era is it for me. Jerjo's analysis pretty much nails it!
I always felt sorry for Mick Taylor, getting caught up in the drugs and the Stones' lifestyle. He ended up living over a bar, nearly destitute. Gram Parson's was another one, although he didn't survive his friendship with Richards.
Although there was a great musical empathy/chemistry between them, I don't get the sense that there was much personal chemistry between Taylor and Richards. Not any great drama that I'm aware of, just different personalities.
Didn't Taylor play a cameo role on all their 50th anniversary shows? He more or less rejoined the band then, really. ISTR seeing a video of them playing 'Sway' in one of those shows.
Wood's a fine guitar player but you don't hear that so much in The Stones. (Same with his old bandmate Kenney Jones in The Who.) On something like The Faces' 'That's All You Need', he's really tearing it up.
Guitarplyrjvb
08-24-2020, 04:57 PM
^^ Yup. Taylor was invited to play a tune or two on their 50th anniversary shows. It was a small bone to throw to him as he was pretty down on his luck at that point of his life. I don't believe he was a major part of the shows. He just came on as a cameo.
Trane
08-24-2020, 05:17 PM
I'm glad Rory didn't get the Stones gig, and yes, in a way, it's too bad Taylor didn't really survive the Stones OK.
Wood's a fine guitar player but you don't hear that so much in The Stones. (Same with his old bandmate Kenney Jones in The Who.) On something like The Faces' 'That's All You Need', he's really tearing it up.
I heard something that needs confrmation, but Ronnie plays/writes the bass more than guitars in the studio albums??
Jerjo
08-24-2020, 05:25 PM
I think the last big stadium tour when they were doing most of Sticky Fingers, Mick came on for a few songs. They'd definitely need him for "Can't You Hear Me Knocking".
Regarding the early years, I have a lot of love for Between the Buttons. I have a playlist in my system of all those dark pop songs and it's one of the few Stones things I can play around my wife without getting the SIGH. But ultimately I am always drawn to the Taylor era. This is where their claim to fame lies, in those drugged out takes on classic American forms and the live shows truly had an element of danger. A few months ago I saw on AXSTV the Havana concert from a few years ago. It was a slick and entertaining show. Chuck Leavell has been the de facto musical director for years now and he has this band in tight form (at least in terms of the keys, Darryl, and Charlie). It was fun to watch and the version of "Out of Control" is borderline epic. "Midnight Rambler" was very long but it had all the piss and vinegar polished out of it. The next day i dug out my DVD of Ladies and Gentlemen, The Rolling Stones. I put on "Rambler" and wow, what a difference. That was a performance on the edge. Jagger whipping the stage with his belt under a bank of red lights, the guitars were Les Pauls and they were ANGRY. When Richards and Taylor hit that double-time stomp after the long bridge with the rhythm section locked in behind them it was like a demonic possession. I might have to play that one again. I think that's the live show where Mick yells after "You Can't Always Get What You Want", "ALRIGHT, you lot have sat on your asses long enough", which leads into one of the rockers played just a little too fast for comfort. Good times.
Ladies And Gentlemen... is probably the best Stones live release. Watched it quite a few times over the years. 1972/3 is their absolute peak as a live act in my mind. It's compiled from a few shows rather than one continuous one (did they dub on the wrong version of 'Happy'?? The synch is way off). However I'm glad we get a no-frills representation of a typical set-list on that tour.
The Some Girls/Texas DVD is also a great watch. After the loooong 1975 set-lists, this is very stripped-down and they play most of that then-new album. As such, they still feel like a vital, contemporary band rather than a 'classic rock' touring jukebox.
As far as the latter-day live shows go, I only take interest when they do lesser-played songs. I don't need to hear rote versions of what Stones fans call 'warhorses'.
I'm glad Rory didn't get the Stones gig, and yes, in a way, it's too bad Taylor didn't really survive the Stones OK.
I heard something that needs confrmation, but Ronnie plays/writes the bass more than guitars in the studio albums??
He did both- remember Wood was bass player in The Jeff Beck Group. Richards also played bass on some Stones tracks.
Despite chops galore, I don't think Rory Gallagher would have fit the band at all. A fairly gentle soul, by all accounts. Plus he was a prolific writer in his own right and Jagger/Richards always dominated that department...much to the chagrin of others.
spacefreak
08-25-2020, 02:13 AM
I heard something that needs confrmation, but Ronnie plays/writes the bass more than guitars in the studio albums??
Probably. Don't forget that he was the bass player in the Jeff Beck Group.
Mister Triscuits
08-25-2020, 11:10 AM
I heard something that needs confrmation, but Ronnie plays/writes the bass more than guitars in the studio albums??
Ronnie Wood doesn't appear to be credited with bass on any of the post-Wyman albums. I always thought Darryl Jones got a raw deal not being taken on as a full member of the band. He plays all the bass on Blue and Lonesome, and almost all of Voodoo Lounge. A Bigger Bang has Jagger credited with bass on several songs, including one that Jones also plays on, Keef plays on a couple, and Jones on the rest. Bridges to Babylon uses pretty much anyone who happened to be passing by the studio that day; Jones is barely on that one.
Apparently it was Wyman and Watts who pushed for Wood to be made a 'proper' member. ISTR that wasn't until somewhere in the late 80s/early 90s!
I think some of Bridges To Babylon sounds better live- 'Saint Of Me' and 'Out Of Control' especially.
I liked it when it came out (I hadn't heard all of their albums then anyway) but A Bigger Bang hasn't aged that well for me. 'Rough Justice', 'Let Me Down Slow' and 'Back Of My Hand' are the tracks I like most. There are some really lousy lyrics on certain other songs.
Mister Triscuits
08-25-2020, 01:08 PM
I liked it when it came out (I hadn't heard all of their albums then anyway) but A Bigger Bang hasn't aged that well for me. 'Rough Justice', 'Let Me Down Slow' and 'Back Of My Hand' are the tracks I like most. There are some really lousy lyrics on certain other songs.
I can overlook some lousy lyrics here and there--one of the songs I'm sure you're referring to is my favorite track on the album, "Rain Fall Down." (But yeah, that "bankers are wankers" bridge. Really?) Also especially dig "Rough Justice," "Dangerous Beauty" (some GREAT lyrics on that one), and "Look What the Cat Dragged In."
^None of the above! I was thinking of pearls like 'I'm like Jello staring down your tits' ('Oh No Not You Again') and 'Come on in, bear your breasts and make me feel at home' ('This Place Is Empty'). At their age! The absolute worst was rhyming 'crock of shit' and 'hypocrite' on 'Sweet Neo Con'.
Mister Triscuits
08-25-2020, 02:13 PM
^None of the above!
I did think you might also have been thinking of "You look like a leper dressed as Sgt Pepper" (which cracks me up).
Trane
08-25-2020, 03:47 PM
Probably. Don't forget that he was the bass player in the Jeff Beck Group.
Not forgetting it (how could I?). ;)
Apparently it was Wyman and Watts who pushed for Wood to be made a 'proper' member. ISTR that wasn't until somewhere in the late 80s/early 90s!
News to me, though, but it's not like it surprises me that much, knowing how much of a twatt Jagger can be. I thought he was in full time as soon as B&B (despite not being on every track), because he had his face on the album cover.
In French, one would say that he had "la t๊te de l'emploi" - meaning he just had the face to be one of them.
^He hadn't joined the band as such in the Black And Blue sessions. I think him being on the 1975 tour was seen as a temporary solution...I don't think The Faces had split at that point.
There are other guitarists on the album- Wayne Perkins and Harvey Mandel. Richards said something like the album was 'auditioning guitar players'.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.