Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 57

Thread: What classical pieces define your classical music tastes?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Re-deployed as of 22 July
    Posts
    0

    What classical pieces define your classical music tastes?

    Fill your boots, no limits on anything.

    Here's just my first dozen.
    1. Vaughan Williams - 6th Symphony
    2. Vaughan Williams - Fantasia on a Theme by Thomas Tallis
    3. Hamilton Harty - An Irish Symphony
    4. Britten - Simple Symphony
    5. Ravel - Introduction and Allegro
    6. Beethoven - 5th Symphony
    7. Tchaikovsky - 6th Symphony
    8. Brahms - 1st Symphony
    9. Delius - too many to pick from, but something
    10. Dag Wiren - Serenade for Strings
    11. Hugo Alfven - Midsummer Vigil
    12. Addinsell - Warsaw Concerto

  2. #2
    Member rcarlberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    7,765
    Nice list. I grew up enamoured of the pastoral stuff, like Debussy, Delius, Ravel, Bax, Vaughn Williams, Ippolitov, Ketelby and so forth. My parents were big Copland fans and "Appalachian Spring" was an early favorite of mine.

    When I discovered the piano reduction of it I fell in love with it all over again.

    Same with Holst's "Planets" for piano.

    Gershwin was another early infatuation, particularly his Latin American and Cuban music. That led into a whole exploration of composers from those regions, too many to name, mostly wonderful.

    Later I got into Panufnik and Lutoslawski in a big way.

    There is literally more truly excellent music than one lifetime can witness.

    You didn't ask, but I'll add anyway, the only music that bores me is the classical formalism of Mozart. His stuff could be composed by computer -- and has been.

  3. #3
    Okay, I'll play:

    (in no particular order)
    1) Bruckner - 9th Symphony
    2) Mahler - 8th Symphony
    3) Part - Magnificat
    4) Rossini - Semiramide
    5) Verdi - Don Carlo
    6) Mussorgsky - Boris Godunov
    7) Rautavaara - 7th Symphony
    8) Meyerbeer - Les Huguenots
    9) Puccini - Tosca
    10) Wagner - Tristan und Isolde

    So, mostly symphonic music in romantic vein plus opera.
    "The world will soon be right again,
    Innocence and undying love will reign."
    - Transatlantic

  4. #4
    Member rcarlberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    7,765
    The wind quintets of Anton Reicha.

  5. #5
    Member hippypants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,153
    rc: I enjoy Mozart, though YMMV. Depends on who's performing what.

    I enjoy Bach well enough too.

    I'd add Arvo Part & Debussy to the mix as well.

  6. #6
    Man of repute progmatist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mesa, Arizona
    Posts
    3,827
    1. Saint Saens: Organ Symphony
    2. Groven: Symphony No. 1 "Towards The Mountains"
    3. Franck: The Accursed Huntsman (Le Chasseur Maudit)
    4. Respighi: Pines Of Rome
    5. Brahms: Serenade No. 1
    6. Shostakovich: Symphony No. 7 "Leningrad"
    7. Tchaikovsky: Symphony No. 2 "Little Russian"
    8. Handel: Water Music Suite
    9. Dvorak: "Dumky" Piano Trio
    10. Saint Saens: Septet in E flat
    11. Jon Lord: Sarabande
    12: Bartok: Music for Strings Percussion and Celesta
    Last edited by progmatist; 07-07-2014 at 02:09 PM.
    "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?"--Dalai Lama

  7. #7
    Ligeti: Requiem
    Penderecki: Threnody For The Victims Of Hiroshima, Partita, and Symphony No. 1
    Stockhausen: Mikrophonie I and II, Sirius, Sternklang, Mantra, Hymnen, and Kurzwellen
    Bartok: Piano Concertos and string quartet
    Mahler: Symphonies 1, 4, 5, 6, and 9 (well, I like all of them, but those are my favorites)
    Prokofiev: Symphonies 1 and 4 (likewise, I like of them, but those are my favorites)
    Bach: Brandenburg Concertos, Orchestral Suites, and the organ pieces
    Beethoven: the piano concertos and the symphonies (particularly 3 and 9)
    Brahms: the piano concertos and symphonies
    Stravinksy: The Rite Of Spring and The Firebird
    Ravel: Bolero and Daphnis et Chloé
    Grieg: the Peer Gynt suites
    Holst: The Planets
    Mussorgsky: Pictures At An Exhibition (preferring the Ravel orchestration over the original solo piano arrangement)

  8. #8
    Boo! walt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Oakland Gardens NY
    Posts
    5,634
    Guillaume Du Fay-Motets-Chansons-Hymns
    Erik Satie-Messe des Pauvres
    Heitor Villa-Lobos-Sexteto Mistico
    Charles Tomlinson Griffes-Piano Sonata
    Conlon Nancarrow-Studies For Player Piano
    J.S.Bach-Musical Offering
    Monteverdi-Vespro Della Beata Vergine
    Olivier Messiaen-Early organ cycles-L'Ascension,La Nativite du Seigneur,Les Corps Glorieux
    Stockhausen-Spiral I and II,Pole,Japan, Wach
    William Byrd-Consort Music
    Alvin Curran-Songs And Views from The Magnetic Garden
    Last edited by walt; 07-10-2014 at 11:29 AM.
    "please do not understand me too quickly"-andre gide

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Re-deployed as of 22 July
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rcarlberg View Post

    You didn't ask, but I'll add anyway, the only music that bores me is the classical formalism of Mozart. His stuff could be composed by computer -- and has been.
    I agree. And same here, most baroque stuff and early classical bores me stupid, Mozart, Händl, Bach, Pachelbel, Vivaldi, Telemann, Scarlatti etc.
    Joseph Haydn is the only one I can stomach, something a bit odd or different about his stuff.

  10. #10
    Man of repute progmatist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mesa, Arizona
    Posts
    3,827
    I like the classical and baroque styles if they receive a modern treatment from composers like Prokofiev, Stravinsky, Respighi, Foulds, Leigh, and Warlock.

    There is a circumstance in which I like baroque music: any piece with brass. I just love the majesty of baroque brass.
    "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?"--Dalai Lama

  11. #11
    Member WytchCrypt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Greater Seattle Area
    Posts
    32
    Mussorgsky - Pictures at an Exhibition, Night on Bald Mountain
    Schoenberg - Pierrot Lunaire, Amos and Aron
    Bach - Nearly everything, especially The Well Tempered Clavier, Toccata & Fugue in Dm, French Suites for Harpsichord, and any Fugue
    Mozart - Don Giovanni
    Erik Satie - Gymnopedies, Gnossiemes
    Holst - The Planets
    Haydn - Most things
    Check out my solo project prog band, Mutiny in Jonestown at https://mutinyinjonestown.bandcamp.com/

    Check out my solo project progressive doom metal band, WytchCrypt at https://wytchcrypt.bandcamp.com/


  12. #12
    A much more realistic task compared to the "What five albums define your musical taste and why?" thread.

    Here goes -

    Stravinsky - Le Sacre du Printemps
    Mussorgsky/Ravel - Pictures at an Exhibition
    Samuel Barber - Piano Concert0 op 38
    Elliot Carter - 1st and 2nd String Quartets
    Bartok - Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta
    Bartok - Concerto for Orchestra
    Ernst Krenek - Statisch Und Exstatisch
    Penderecki - Violin Concerto No. 2 'Metamorphosen'
    Einojuhani Rautavaara - Symphony No. 7 "Angel of Light
    Magnus Lindberg - Sculpture
    Anton Webern - Variations for orchestra (1940)
    Joseph Scwantner - ...And the Mountains Rising Nowhere
    Joan Tower - Silver Ladders

    There's some holes in the list, but it is fine for now.

    Could have more chamber pieces, as well as more atonal.
    And if there were a god, I think it very unlikely that he would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence - Russell

  13. #13
    Progga mogrooves's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Past
    Posts
    1,900
    Carlo Gesualdo - Madrigals, Book VI
    Leo Ornstein - Danse Sauvage
    Ives - Central Park In the Dark
    Satie - Desiccated Embryos
    Schoenberg - Chamber Symphony #1
    Webern - Five Pieces For Orchestra
    Cage - Fontana Mix
    Morton Feldman - Rothko Chapel
    LaMonte Young - For Brass
    Riley/Glass/Reich - the usual stuff
    John Luther Adams - In the White Silence
    Louis Andriessen - De Tijd
    "Bang On A Can": Gordon/Wolfe/Lang, etc.....
    Hell, they ain't even old-timey ! - Homer Stokes

  14. #14
    Beethoven's 9th and 5th
    Bach - Toccata and Fugue in D Minor
    Orff - Carmina Burana
    Ravel - Bolero
    Bartok - all the string quartets ... I could never pick a favorite
    Stravinsky - Firebird, Rite of Spring
    Holst - The Planets
    Mussorgsky - Pictures at an Exhibition
    Gershwin - Rhapsody in Blue
    Gorecki - 3rd Symphony
    Strauss - Also Sprach Zarathusrta
    Britten: War Requiem

    Kind of a predictable list, I suppose, but there you have it.

  15. #15
    Berg-Three Orchestral Pieces
    Honegger-Symphony No. 4
    William Schuman-Symphony No. 7
    Penderecki-Polymorphia
    Ligeti-Hamburg Concerto; Double Concerto; Violin Concerto; Sonata for solo cello
    Lutoslawski-Symphony No. 4
    Ravel-Le Tombeau de Couperin
    Prokofiev-Piano Concerto No. 2
    Magnus Lindberg-Clarinet Concerto
    Debussy-Prelude To The Afternoon Of A Faun; piano music
    Varese-Deserts
    Bartok-The 3 Piano Concertos, Concerto for two pianos & percussion
    Hans Werner Henze-Symphony No. 10
    Bernstein-Symphony No. 2
    Nielsen-Symphony No. 3
    Schoenberg-Book Of Hanging Gardens; Moses und Aron
    Hindemith-Mathis der Maler; Sonata for harp
    Mahler-Adagio (10th symphony)
    Schnittke-Symphony No. 1 & 8; String Quartet No. 3; Concerto Grosso No. 1

  16. #16
    Member FrippWire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Dearborn, MI
    Posts
    625
    I'm big on Stravinsky, Bartok, Berg, Varese, Webern, Ruggles, Ives, Part, Schoenberg, Carter, Cage, Ligeti, Boulez, Penderecki, Reich and Glass to name a few.

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Re-deployed as of 22 July
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by simon moon View Post
    A much more realistic task compared to the "What five albums define your musical taste and why?" thread.
    EXACTLY the reason I created the thread, to give people a breather and room to expand. That 5 album thread was doing my head in!

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Re-deployed as of 22 July
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mogrooves View Post
    Riley/Glass/Reich - the usual stuff
    "Bang On A Can": Gordon/Wolfe/Lang, etc.....
    LOL! Excellent

  19. #19
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,118
    Sometimes, I listen to some Haydn, Dvorak (New World Symphony is probably my fave classical classical ) Beethoven, Schubert, Vivaldi , Debussy, Orff (well mostly Carmina), Salieri (Wolfgang's foe in Amadeus), Twisted Sister, Riossini's opera overture (but not the operas themselves) and maybe a few more

    In the Russian dept: Prokofiev, Mussorgsky and especially Rachmaninov


    I'll be back for modern classical if I feel like it...
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by PeterG View Post
    most baroque stuff and early classical bores me stupid, Mozart, Händl, Bach, Pachelbel, Vivaldi, Telemann, Scarlatti etc.
    Joseph Haydn is the only one I can stomach, something a bit odd or different about his stuff.
    OK, you clearly deplore the music that I cherish most (more than prog, in fact). Taste and opinions will vary, of course. But to my early-music-eyes this just appears wrong-headed and curable should you hear the best performances of the best stuff. Also, I suspect that you're not a classically-trained singer, which makes a massive difference on how you view a lot of the best baroque music. Moreover, I think most musicologists who specialise in eighteenth-century music (including myself, as it happens) would convincingly argue that Mozart actually has more oddness, contrapuntal complexity, harmonic unpredictability and emotional depths than Haydn. I love them both, as it happens, but my perspective is that Haydn tends to be convivial, affectionate and cleverly playful, whereas Mozart tends to be more subtle, with clear signposts of melancholy in his woodwind writing, and much more astute dramatic characterization (even in his instrumental and orchestral music).

    As for Mozart being formulaic and like a computer, that's just silly bollocks. I'd like to see a computer compose Idomeneo, Cosi fan tutte, the C Minor Mass, the slow movement from Piano Concerto No. 20 in D minor, the string quartets written in tribute to Haydn, the Flute and Harp Concerto, the finale of the Jupiter symphony (No. 41), etc.
    :-)

    It's intriguing to see how few posters so far mention any music before Beethoven. So just to provide some pedantic contrariness:

    Taverner: Missa Gloria tibi trinitas
    Carver: O bone Jesu
    Lassus: masses, Lagrime di San Pietro
    Tallis: Lamentations of Jeremiah; Spem in alium
    Byrd: motets; masses; consort music
    Tomas Luis de Victoria: Requiem; motets
    Dowland: Lachrimae; numerous melancholic lute songs
    Giovanni Gabrieli: polychoral motets; canzonas
    Monteverdi: madrigals (especially books 4-6); L'Orfeo; Vespro della Beata Virgine; Selva morale e spirituale
    Carissimi: Jepthe
    Schutz: Psalms of David; Symphoniae Sacrae; Die sieben worte; O bone Jesu
    Purcell: anthems; court odes; Fantazias for viols; The Fairy Queen; King Arthur
    Charpentier: Le Reniement de St Pierre
    Vivaldi: Latin psalms; string concertos
    Telemann: Paris Quartets; Musique de Table (he may not be as immediately impressive as his close contemporaries Bach and Handel - but they all liked his music and also cultivated correspondences with him, and which tells us something useful, I think)
    Rameau: especially orchestral suites/ballets from his operas, e.g. Les Boreades, Zoroastre, Les Indes galantes.
    Bach: cantatas (particularly early Weimar-period ones); passions; masses; motets; double violin concerto; Brandenburg concertos, etc.
    Handel: Latin church music; Roman cantatas; operas, English odes, concerti grossi, dramatic oratorios, etc.
    Domenico Scarlatti: Stabat mater (I also really like his father Alessandro's music, which is very under-rated)
    Pergolesi: Stabat mater
    Gluck: so-called "reform" operas, eg. Orfeo ed Euridice, Alceste, Armide
    John Christian Bach: chamber music; concertos; operas
    Haydn: The Creation; London symphonies; six late masses; trumpet concerto; string quartets, etc.
    Mozart: most of the operas written after c.1774; symphonies and concertos written after c.1778; church music

    I suppose you meant to say Handel rather than "Händl" (which isn't the correct German spelling of his name, and only nationalistically-inclined Germans insist on using "Händel". He was a naturalized British citizen, and signed his own name Handel, just as he signed it as the Italian "Hendel" when in Rome, etc. Nobody calls Lully "Giovanni Battista Lulli", although I suppose plenty of people use "Orlando di Lasso" rather than Roland de Lassus...).

    I suppose the common denominator of a lot of the music I've listed above is that it involves voices, sometimes soloists with instruments, and sometimes just smallish choirs. This may have something to do with the fact I'm a singer, and will also have something to do with my academic interests. But I genuinely love and intellectually cherish a lot of the music written before Beethoven started having problems with his hearing.

    Mind you, I also love Schumann, Mahler, Ravel, Vaughan Williams, Holst, some Britten, ...
    Last edited by Dodie; 07-08-2014 at 08:46 AM.

  21. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Re-deployed as of 22 July
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dodie View Post
    Taste and opinions will vary.
    Exactly, try not to forget that.

  22. #22
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    32S 116E
    Posts
    0
    I started with classical, and only later got into pop/rock. That possibly helps to explain why I liked progressive rock when it arrived.
    Also, I learned piano, so that probably influenced the kind of classical I liked most.

    Debussy was always my favourite. Of the old masters, I think I enjoy J.S.Bach more for having played the pieces on piano than I otherwise would - it is very satisfying to play because all the fingers get workout. Not that I don't enjoy listening to Bach. Chopin was my other love. I was never that fond of Mozart for some reason - my father was the same, he loved a lot of classical, but he thought Mozart was "a little bit too smart".

  23. #23
    Member rcarlberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    7,765
    Quote Originally Posted by progmatist View Post
    There is a circumstance in which I like baroque music: any piece with brass. I just love the majesty of baroque brass.
    Yeah but most, if not all, modern recordings of Renaissance brass music are recorded using contemporary chromatic brass instruments.

    Period brass instruments were what's called "natural horns", without keys. The players had to change pitch strictly by control of the overtones produced by their lips and breath.

    MUCH MUCH harder to play. That's why almost nobody does it.

  24. #24
    The 9 numbered and two un-numbered symphonies of Anton Bruckner. I have every Historical recording of his symphonies from 1924 to 1948, and they are my musical life blood.

    Also the Tone Poems of Richard Strauss. Again, historical recordings- by the composer, Willem Mengelberg, Clemens Kraus, etc.

    Hector Berlioz-his symphonies and overtures, again, historical recordings with Sir Thomas Beecham, Pierre Monteux, etc.
    "and what music unites, man should not take apart"-Helmut Koellen

  25. #25
    Man of repute progmatist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mesa, Arizona
    Posts
    3,827
    Quote Originally Posted by rcarlberg View Post
    MUCH MUCH harder to play. That's why almost nobody does it.
    Which is why I got such a kick out of this....

    "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?"--Dalai Lama

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •