Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 33 of 33

Thread: FM: Black Noise

  1. #26
    Member Since: 3/27/2002 MYSTERIOUS TRAVELLER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    The Kingdom of YHVH
    Posts
    2,770
    interesting that so many here are calling Headroom "improvised" or "jam"

    Each of the 2 pieces on Headroom are intricately composed Prog with several distinct movements and compelling variety. True, the musicians get to play solos within the structure of the movements, but the pieces are still very composed.
    Why is it whenever someone mentions an artist that was clearly progressive (yet not the Symph weenie definition of Prog) do certain people feel compelled to snort "thats not Prog" like a whiny 5th grader?

  2. #27
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,114
    Quote Originally Posted by MYSTERIOUS TRAVELLER View Post
    interesting that so many here are calling Headroom "improvised" or "jam"

    Each of the 2 pieces on Headroom are intricately composed Prog with several distinct movements and compelling variety. True, the musicians get to play solos within the structure of the movements, but the pieces are still very composed.
    I don't think anyone here hinted at total improv or full-on jams, from what I read.

    We'd have to compare the four versions of each tracks to check out just how much improvised they were... but three of them are lost forever, I believe.

    So yes, there was a suite structure to both tracks, but from what I remember of the booklet, I don't know how much it was really all that structured (Deller's solos, for ex)
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  3. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrotum Scissor View Post
    ^ Well, about one thing am I personally certain; FM Or Max Webster et al.) vs. Saga equals some 14 - 1/2. And the latter score doesn't even exist.
    Aw, c'mon man, Saga had some good tunes.

    I know they aren't near as adventurous as those other groups, but sometimes when I'm in the mood for catchy-yet-technical music Saga fits the bill quite nicely.

  4. #29
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,114
    Quote Originally Posted by aith01 View Post
    Aw, c'mon man, Saga had some good tunes.

    I know they aren't near as adventurous as those other groups, but sometimes when I'm in the mood for catchy-yet-technical music Saga fits the bill quite nicely.
    TBH, as Toronto youths, we (that's the majority of male late-teens) didn't feel any pride about Saga as we did in Rush, Triumph, FM, Webster or even Goddo (who never managed to break through in the US)...

    Not to mention punkier bands like Teenage Heads or The Diodes...

    we started paying attention to Saga once we heard they were really big in Germany (around Heads Or Tales release or the In Transit album)
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  5. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by aith01 View Post
    Aw, c'mon man, Saga had some good tunes.

    I know they aren't near as adventurous as those other groups, but sometimes when I'm in the mood for catchy-yet-technical music Saga fits the bill quite nicely.
    To me, this is the main problem with Saga; I simply don't find it as "catchy" as obviously intended - and I'm a significant fan of genuinely groovy and rhythm-based rock/pop. They were huge here in Norway (and Sweden), and I still shrug at those theatrical and artificial and almost downright animated vocals and the band's desperate attempts at appearing more refined than what substance allowed them. I still keep their debut album, but it strikes me on each and every listen how generally dull and unsuccessfully their musical recipé was presented. They had ideas, but not the means of articulating them in a convincing manner. I have to admit to feeling likewise about several other "mainstream prog" bands from the era 1977-85. And I effectively tried them all and saw a number of them in concert.
    "Improvisation is not an excuse for musical laziness" - Fred Frith
    "[...] things that we never dreamed of doing in Crimson or in any band that I've been in," - Tony Levin speaking of SGM

  6. #31
    Member moecurlythanu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    The Planet Lovetron
    Posts
    13,064
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrotum Scissor View Post
    I still keep their debut album, but it strikes me on each and every listen how generally dull and unsuccessfully their musical recipé was presented.
    Yeah, the debut is the only one I have, and it's pretty pedestrian.

  7. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrotum Scissor View Post
    To me, this is the main problem with Saga; I simply don't find it as "catchy" as obviously intended - and I'm a significant fan of genuinely groovy and rhythm-based rock/pop. They were huge here in Norway (and Sweden), and I still shrug at those theatrical and artificial and almost downright animated vocals and the band's desperate attempts at appearing more refined than what substance allowed them. I still keep their debut album, but it strikes me on each and every listen how generally dull and unsuccessfully their musical recipé was presented. They had ideas, but not the means of articulating them in a convincing manner. I have to admit to feeling likewise about several other "mainstream prog" bands from the era 1977-85. And I effectively tried them all and saw a number of them in concert.
    Well I can understand that. Saga was a band that, IMO, got much better into their later career and defined their own sound recombination -- lots of crunchy guitars with lots of keyboards, but not really getting into metal territory. I dunno... I tend to listen to their 90s and 2000s work much more often than anything of theirs from the 1980s -- when I listen to them, which isn't all that often anymore.

    And actually, I wouldn't even really consider them mainstream prog or even prog at all (again, just my opinion).

    But if someone doesn't find their stuff catchy or interesting, that's okay by me.

  8. #33
    Member Mascodagama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    7th Circle of Brexit
    Posts
    2,170
    Quote Originally Posted by aith01 View Post
    Well I can understand that. Saga was a band that, IMO, got much better into their later career and defined their own sound recombination -- lots of crunchy guitars with lots of keyboards, but not really getting into metal territory. I dunno... I tend to listen to their 90s and 2000s work much more often than anything of theirs from the 1980s -- when I listen to them, which isn't all that often anymore.

    And actually, I wouldn't even really consider them mainstream prog or even prog at all (again, just my opinion).

    But if someone doesn't find their stuff catchy or interesting, that's okay by me.
    It's been ages since I really listened to any, but I listened to them quite a bit as a teenager and I did dig some of their records. But they always struck me as a band that was torn between going in the direction of doing stuff that was musically interesting / "proggy", and trying to do melodic AOR that would get airplay / hits. For my taste the results were sometimes nice, but always felt a bit compromised.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •