Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 62

Thread: Crimson w/ Wetton in the Future???

  1. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Scott Bails View Post
    We're talking about a band with three drummers, right?
    Good point. I said earlier that if Levin was in the band, there'd be no room for Wetton to play bass. But between what you said here and the triple double they used to tour as I retract my statement. There is room for Wetton.

    As far as why should Fripp stand up to play live? I don't know, ask Hackett. I don't think its impacted his ability to play and its so much more friendly toward the audience. Oh what am I saying, Fripp being friendly toward the audience that pays him lots of money? That will never happen...

  2. #27
    I hate to see all these 70's prog bands getting so old. Days are numbered, so enjoy anything you can. The 80's prog bands still left will not be nearly as interesting, and it only gets worse from there.

    It was a special time, and I don't see it happening again anytime soon.

  3. #28
    I would love to see JW with Crimso again, but he has stated, I would have to search for the quote, that he no longer plays bass like he did in Crimso anymore.

  4. #29
    Member District97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by arabicadabra View Post
    I'm guessing you did NOT get to a District 97 show with John Wetton where they played everything you could hope to hear from those KC albums....
    Thanks, Greg. Yes, it was an honor to play that music with John, and he still sounded absolutely fantastic on it. For the time being, our live album with him is the closest you'll get to him being a part of Crimson again. Here's a taste of him singing that material for the first time in 40 years:



    And a live video of Schizoid Man:


    One More Red Night is available at http://www.district97.net/store as well as Amazon, iTunes etc. Truly amazing that we got to revisit that part of his past with him!

  5. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by Paulrus View Post
    But it's been pretty clear for a very long time that Fripp is in a place musically that JW doesn't really want any part of, and vice versa.
    To say Wetton doesn't really want any part of the Crimson legacy would be a mistake. Wetton has played King Crimson numbers in recent years with District 97, with UK, with Icon and with Asia. He's also played UK material in UK and Icon. Indeed, Wetton has shown more willingness to visit his back catalogue live than many musicians.

    Henry
    Where Are They Now? Yes news: http://www.bondegezou.co.uk/wh_now.htm
    Blogdegezou, the accompanying blog: http://bondegezou.blogspot.com/

  6. #31
    I'd like for Robby Flipp to sit on stool, don a wig (check the wonders of G. Simmons and R. Blackmore) and stop using contact lenses at any thinkable point - thus closing in on his aesthetic of the 70s so as to approach the given ideal of real prog. And I'd like for him to stay exactly like that for the upcoming 35-40 years, performing only covers on his own Curriculum for audiences wearing wigs as well.

    He must!
    "Improvisation is not an excuse for musical laziness" - Fred Frith
    "[...] things that we never dreamed of doing in Crimson or in any band that I've been in," - Tony Levin speaking of SGM

  7. #32
    Member Paulrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    The Left Coast
    Posts
    2,171
    Quote Originally Posted by bondegezou View Post
    To say Wetton doesn't really want any part of the Crimson legacy would be a mistake. Wetton has played King Crimson numbers in recent years with District 97, with UK, with Icon and with Asia. He's also played UK material in UK and Icon. Indeed, Wetton has shown more willingness to visit his back catalogue live than many musicians.

    Henry
    Henry, it's very different for JW to occasionally play music from his own time with KC, versus being involved with RF in a current KC-related project. That's what I was trying to say.
    I'm holding out for the Wilson-mixed 5.1 super-duper walletbuster special anniversary extra adjectives edition.

  8. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Paulrus View Post
    Henry, it's very different for JW to occasionally play music from his own time with KC, versus being involved with RF in a current KC-related project. That's what I was trying to say.
    Current Crimson: only plays old music.

    John Wetton: has done several tours only playing old music.

    There isn't an obvious mismatch.

    Henry
    Where Are They Now? Yes news: http://www.bondegezou.co.uk/wh_now.htm
    Blogdegezou, the accompanying blog: http://bondegezou.blogspot.com/

  9. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by Paulrus View Post
    Henry, it's very different for JW to occasionally play music from his own time with KC, versus being involved with RF in a current KC-related project. That's what I was trying to say.
    Given how much touring the current KC does, being in KC would hardly be more of a full-time job than UK or D97.

    In any case, it seems KC is destined to remain with the same line-up. What is intriguing is whether there was any discussion of JW joining and, if so, why it didn't happen.
    Calyx (Canterbury Scene) - http://www.calyx-canterbury.fr
    Legends In Their Own Lunchtime (blog) - https://canterburyscene.wordpress.com/
    My latest books : "Yes" (2017) - https://lemotetlereste.com/musiques/yes/ + "L'Ecole de Canterbury" (2016) - http://lemotetlereste.com/musiques/lecoledecanterbury/ + "King Crimson" (2012/updated 2018) - http://lemotetlereste.com/musiques/kingcrimson/
    Canterbury & prog interviews - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdf...IUPxUMA/videos

  10. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by calyx View Post
    What is intriguing is whether there was any discussion of JW joining and, if so, why it didn't happen.
    Crimson's tour last fall coincided with Asia's - that might be a start.

  11. #36
    My guess would be that if Fripp said, "Come on tour and sing some old Crimson numbers," Wetton would be up for that. He's got problems playing bass these days -- did he just sing with District 97 while someone else played bass? -- although Wetton still did UK (the band, not the country) dates. Why wouldn't he given the tours he has done? So did Fripp never offer, or was Fripp's way of doing things not to Wetton's liking?

    Henry
    Where Are They Now? Yes news: http://www.bondegezou.co.uk/wh_now.htm
    Blogdegezou, the accompanying blog: http://bondegezou.blogspot.com/

  12. #37
    I'm here for the moosic NogbadTheBad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    10,258
    Quote Originally Posted by bondegezou View Post
    Current Crimson: only plays old music.

    Henry
    Apparently they are working on new material, I'm hopeful it's more Crimsony that the Scarcity Of Miracles material.
    Ian

    Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on progrock.com
    https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-a...re-happy-hour/

    Gordon Haskell - "You've got to keep the groove in your head and play a load of bollocks instead"
    I blame Wynton, what was the question?
    There are only 10 types of people in the World, those who understand binary and those that don't.

  13. #38
    IIRC, at the time the new KC was announced (after quite a few tantalizing hints that JW might be involved, as referenced above), John said that he was never asked, and that it wouldn't have made sense anyway, unless Robert was envisioning a primarily "song-oriented" format. My own reading between the lines is that with John's carpal tunnel issues, he can only play the bass to a limited extent (though he seemed quite good with UK material, that may mark the limit of what he can comfortably do, and even then I suspect he had to play through a lot of pain), which leaves him out of Robert's more instrumentally ambitious ideas.

    This reality is disappointing to me, because JW has always been my favorite rock vocalist, and I would love to see him working within the more artistically ambitious context of KC. But given the realities of his carpal tunnel situation and his desire to focus primarily on pop singing/songwriting, I understand why it probably will never happen.

  14. #39
    Member Haruspex Carnage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Everywhere, but currently NY
    Posts
    176
    IMO everything about those D97 videos and the JW of today rubs me completely the wrong way...no interest whatsoever about him being in any new Crimsons...new Crimson at large should be cool though with over a dozen Harrison-led drum bits (P@ said something about this over FB) and three new songs for the upcoming Euro and Canadian tours it's looking like.

  15. #40
    ItalProgRules's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Niagara County, NY
    Posts
    0
    Wetton could play some piano and acoustic guitar, besides singing, in such a theoretical reunion, leaving Tony Levin to play bass.
    High Vibration Go On - R.I.P. Chris Squire

  16. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by bondegezou View Post
    Current Crimson: only plays old music.
    2000-2011 isn't that old.

  17. #42
    New Crimson is very little singing. See no need for Wetton this is a musician first band now and Wetton is not up to that anymore.

  18. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by Spiral View Post
    2000-2011 isn't that old.
    No, but they don't only play music from 2000-11. They have, so far, played music from 1969 to... well, yes, 2014 with the short percussion pieces.

    Ignoring the short new bits, I make it, based on the first show:

    1960s: 1
    1970s: 8
    1980s: 0
    1990s: 0
    2000s: 2
    2010s: 2

    Henry
    Where Are They Now? Yes news: http://www.bondegezou.co.uk/wh_now.htm
    Blogdegezou, the accompanying blog: http://bondegezou.blogspot.com/

  19. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by bondegezou View Post

    Ignoring the short new bits, I make it, based on the first show:
    Hate to say it, but four post-2000 pieces is downright radical for a veteran band these days.

  20. #45
    Quote Originally Posted by bondegezou View Post
    They have, so far, played music from 1969 to... well, yes, 2014
    Just what I meant. They may disappointingly be skewing that way by having 2/3 of the set from the earliest few years, but it's not only old stuff.

    Quote Originally Posted by bRETT View Post
    Hate to say it, but four post-2000 pieces is downright radical for a veteran band these days.
    Being willing to rearrange the older stuff and making it sound as powerful as ever (for the most part) is just as radical, I'd say. Or at least unusual.

  21. #46
    Fripp doesn't seem to be the reunion/revisit the past sort of fellow. But if he was short on cash anything's possible..

  22. #47
    Quote Originally Posted by bRETT View Post
    Hate to say it, but four post-2000 pieces is downright radical for a veteran band these days.
    True... well, in spirit, but you exaggerate, I think. Four, rather short post-2000 pieces is less than many. It's probably about the same playtime(?) as the new material on the most recent Yes shows (two pieces, ~15 minutes).

    Rush are doing 6 post-2000 songs currently. I saw Toto recently: 5 songs from their new album, including the long one. The recent live Asia release, recorded late 2012, had 5 recent (post-reunion) songs; 7 post-2000 compositions if you include Howe's two solo pieces. Ian Anderson, if he counts for Jethro Tull, was doing all of Thick as a Brick, but with all of the new Thick as a Brick 2.

    On the other hand, UK was all oldies.

    Henry
    Last edited by bondegezou; 05-27-2015 at 06:55 PM.
    Where Are They Now? Yes news: http://www.bondegezou.co.uk/wh_now.htm
    Blogdegezou, the accompanying blog: http://bondegezou.blogspot.com/

  23. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by Spiral View Post
    Being willing to rearrange the older stuff and making it sound as powerful as ever (for the most part) is just as radical, I'd say. Or at least unusual.
    Again, is that particularly unusual? Numerous acts have re-arranged older stuff. How successful they've been is a matter of taste, but the idea of re-arranging older material is not uncommon. Yes did acoustic "Roundabout" and "South Side of the Sky", and chopped around "Mind Drive", a few years ago. Even now, in playing whole albums with their original arrangements, they're changing the arrangements from what they've been playing live for years. I've seen UK and Asia play re-arranged King Crimson numbers, while Icon (Wetton/Downes) did new arrangements of various older pieces they'd been associated with.

    Henry
    Where Are They Now? Yes news: http://www.bondegezou.co.uk/wh_now.htm
    Blogdegezou, the accompanying blog: http://bondegezou.blogspot.com/

  24. #49
    Member 2steves's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    NYC and RBK, NY
    Posts
    206
    Quote Originally Posted by zeprogmeister View Post
    Fripp doesn't seem to be the reunion/revisit the past sort of fellow. But if he was short on cash anything's possible..
    Pretty sure he's short on cash---but he never does what a fan wants---even 3 drummers is just to annoy Bruford. lol

  25. #50
    Member Haruspex Carnage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Everywhere, but currently NY
    Posts
    176
    Quote Originally Posted by bondegezou View Post
    Again, is that particularly unusual? Numerous acts have re-arranged older stuff. How successful they've been is a matter of taste, but the idea of re-arranging older material is not uncommon. Yes did acoustic "Roundabout" and "South Side of the Sky", and chopped around "Mind Drive", a few years ago. Even now, in playing whole albums with their original arrangements, they're changing the arrangements from what they've been playing live for years. I've seen UK and Asia play re-arranged King Crimson numbers, while Icon (Wetton/Downes) did new arrangements of various older pieces they'd been associated with.

    Henry
    i feel like, in the case of YES, there's a difference between rearrange and completely butcher.

    And let's be honest, as cool as the KC songs were, they weren't rearranged/reinterpreted at all from a compositional standpoint.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •