Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31

Thread: First four Gentle Giant albums - which versions??

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    First four Gentle Giant albums - which versions??

    So I recently purchased 3 GG re-issues that have come out through a company called Eastworld. Haven't had a chance to listen to them yet but they look horrible! The colours in the artwork are all heavily saturated and the company clearly hasn't taken any care with the reproduction of the artwork. Some may say this is secondary to the music and of course it is but I do appreciate a well rounded package. And let's face, it's not that hard to take a bit of care.

    I know there are a number of pressings of the first four albums and so I wondered which ones are considered the best? I have just ordered the Alucard editions of Three Friends and Octopus through Amazon so I'm hoping they've done a good job with them.

  2. #2
    Member Zeuhlmate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    7,315
    There is a recent thread about this, but I would go for Repertoire records.

    http://www.progressiveears.org/forum...t=gentle+giant
    Last edited by Zeuhlmate; 12-11-2012 at 08:49 AM.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Cygnus74 View Post
    So I recently purchased 3 GG re-issues that have come out through a company called Eastworld. Haven't had a chance to listen to them yet but they look horrible! The colours in the artwork are all heavily saturated and the company clearly hasn't taken any care with the reproduction of the artwork. Some may say this is secondary to the music and of course it is but I do appreciate a well rounded package. And let's face, it's not that hard to take a bit of care.

    I know there are a number of pressings of the first four albums and so I wondered which ones are considered the best? I have just ordered the Alucard editions of Three Friends and Octopus through Amazon so I'm hoping they've done a good job with them.
    Maybe you should give some reference points for other Giant CDs yhou have that you think sound good?

    Personally, I think the Octopus SHM-SACD is stunning, but it's not mastered bright and treble heavy like a lot of people seem to enjoy, so I'm not sure I'd recommend it knowing nothing about your taste.

  4. #4
    Member aplodon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by Cygnus74 View Post
    a company called Eastworld
    Never heard of any GG issues on a label like that. (Never heard of the label at all, actually.) Are they legit?

  5. #5
    I got them from Burning Shed so I assume they are legit

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Milan, Italy
    Posts
    82
    VINYL !!!!!

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Dedatolo View Post
    VINYL !!!!!
    Except for the Octopus SHM-SACD, this is very good advice. The first three albums have never had a CD issue to compare with how they sounded on the best vinyl pressings.

    Speaking of vinyl, has anyone heard that 180 gram version of ATT that is out from that company in Canada? Apparently mastered flat from hi-res digital files made from the master tape.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Redding,Ca
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffCarney View Post
    Except for the Octopus SHM-SACD, this is very good advice. The first three albums have never had a CD issue to compare with how they sounded on the best vinyl pressings.

    Speaking of vinyl, has anyone heard that 180 gram version of ATT that is out from that company in Canada? Apparently mastered flat from hi-res digital files made from the master tape.
    Jeff,is this in 5.1 or just good old stereo?

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Rand Kelly View Post
    Jeff,is this in 5.1 or just good old stereo?
    Stereo.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffCarney View Post
    Except for the Octopus SHM-SACD, this is very good advice.
    Agreed. Octopus SHM sounds amazingly bad.

  11. #11
    Member aplodon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by gregory View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffCarney View Post
    Except for the Octopus SHM-SACD, this is very good advice.
    Agreed. Octopus SHM sounds amazingly bad.
    Then you disagree, actually (If not the Octopus SHM is something else than Octopus SHM-SACD). What Jeff said was that the Octopus SHM-SACD sounds very good and is the only cd that is an alternative to an original vinyl.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by aplodon View Post
    Then you disagree, actually (If not the Octopus SHM is something else than Octopus SHM-SACD). What Jeff said was that the Octopus SHM-SACD sounds very good and is the only cd that is an alternative to an original vinyl.
    Yes, sure, thank you. I was mistaken in definition, but not in valuation) I have many CD versions of GG - and I can tell that SHMCD Octopus is the worst of all Octopuses I own. Infra bass all over, that drownes the right sound.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Dedatolo View Post
    VINYL !!!!!
    Absolutely vinyl!

  14. #14
    That's Mr. to you, Sir!! Trane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    in a cosmic jazzy-groove around Brussels
    Posts
    6,122
    I have the Repertoire versions (which is for Octopus unfortunately with the Dean cover >> prefer the US version), except for 3F, which is the Line version (but with the real artwork)

    I'm fine with them...

    Except for IAGH, I have made a CD-r compilation of the rest of their albums, with roughly 50-60% of Interview on it...
    my music collection increased tenfolds when I switched from drug-addicts to complete nutcases.

  15. #15
    GG and ATT - the Vertigo/Repetoire versions
    TF and IAGH - the Alucard versions.

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by jcarr73729 View Post
    GG and ATT - the Vertigo/Repetoire versions
    TF and IAGH - the Alucard versions.
    Repertoire vesrion of TF is excellent. IAGH is fifth GG album...

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by gregory View Post
    Repertoire vesrion of TF is excellent. IAGH is fifth GG album...
    My error, but the Alucard release of 'Octopus' is equally good, and I'm also fortunate enough to have the SACD too.

    In general, for CDs, the Alucards are the best available for the GGs they have rights too. The earliest two releases, as I said above, are best served by the Vertigo/Repetoire releases, and the later releases by the recent boxed set.

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    186
    Go for the new special editions which will be released on a remote island near Jamaica this April. I believe the Yes Cruise is making a stop there, commandeered by Captain Downes...

  19. #19
    Member Dok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Land of the Blue Smoke
    Posts
    386
    I compared the new Eastworld Octopus to the Alucard last night and the Eastworld is horribly bright. Mastered by one Gert Van Hoeyen who did the Thin Lizzy remasters I believe. What I had trouble discerning however is the resolution. It did sound really clean. The Alucard is supposed to be from the master tape but I'm not 100% sure of that. Alucard only had the rights to release Octopus and TF in the US, so, did they just use a copy tape here or did they actually have the original master from the UK? Jeff? Any ideas? The Eastworlds are licensed from Universal. I agree with the OP on the art and package quality... bare bones, except they do have picture discs. There is a small essay in the first album booklet but none in AtT or Octopus. Also Octopus is the only one that gives a mastering credit. I assume GVH did the first two but who knows for sure?! And why was TF left out? I also have the recent BGO reissue of the first two albums and they do sound pretty good I think. Haven't had a chance yet to compare them to the Eastworlds.
    Last edited by Dok; 12-13-2012 at 11:13 PM.

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Dok View Post
    I compared the new Eastworld Octopus to the Alucard last night and the Eastworld is horribly bright. Mastered by one Gert Van Hoeyen who did the Thin Lizzy remasters I believe. What I had trouble discerning however is the resolution. It did sound really clean. The Alucard is supposed to be from the master tape but I'm not 100% sure of that. Alucard only had the rights to release Octopus and TF in the US, so, did they just use a copy tape here or did they actually have the original master from the UK? Jeff? Any ideas? The Eastworlds are licensed from Universal. I agree with the OP on the art and package quality... bare bones, except they do have picture discs. There is a small essay in the first album booklet but none in AtT or Octopus. Also Octopus is the only one that gives a mastering credit. I assume GVH did the first two but who knows for sure?! And why was TF left out? I also have the recent BGO reissue of the first two albums and they do sound pretty good I think. Haven't had a chance yet to compare them to the Eastworlds.
    Gert Van Hoeyen is still active?

    That sounds like it might have been a mastering credit that carried over from the old Vertigo CDs, because he did those.

    As regards the "resolution" I really don't know without hearing it.

  21. #21
    Member Dok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Land of the Blue Smoke
    Posts
    386
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffCarney View Post
    Gert Van Hoeyen is still active?

    That sounds like it might have been a mastering credit that carried over from the old Vertigo CDs, because he did those.

    As regards the "resolution" I really don't know without hearing it.
    Don't know about being still active other then he is listed at the bottom of the page inside the booklet, almost like an afterthought, but it could be just a copy of the songs and artist blurbs taken from somewhere else. The credits spell Pug's name wrong - Wethers instead of Weathers. What Vertigo CDs do you speak of? Not the Line? Road Goes on Forever?

  22. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Dok View Post
    What Vertigo CDs do you speak of?
    Polygram issued AtT and Octopus years ago. I know the latter was mastered by Van Hoeyen. Not sure about AtT.

  23. #23
    Member Dok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Land of the Blue Smoke
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Jeff... a bit of a mystery. I'm wondering if they just lifted the inside of that Octopus booklet. The Eastworld is a very simple one page folded in the middle insert that lists the song titles and GG's comments under each one. I assume the disc you mean is this - http://www.amazon.co.uk/Octopus-Gent...5691685&sr=1-2 No current at the time reviews but one review does speak unfavorably of GVH's mastering...

  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Dok View Post
    Thanks Jeff... a bit of a mystery. I'm wondering if they just lifted the inside of that Octopus booklet. The Eastworld is a very simple one page folded in the middle insert that lists the song titles and GG's comments under each one. I assume the disc you mean is this - http://www.amazon.co.uk/Octopus-Gent...5691685&sr=1-2 No current at the time reviews but one review does speak unfavorably of GVH's mastering...
    Yes, that is the one. I don't really care for the mastering on it. Too much EQ for my taste and it sounds "jacked up."

    But then I'm always a bit surprised by some of the CDs that are recommended when it comes to Giant, so ymmv.

  25. #25
    Any notable remasterings to avoid when it comes to GG? In terms of lots of compression\heavily EQ'ed, or just outright botched in some way.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •