I agree. Or even just let the teams play the full 15. It's the super bowl, there's no next week to make players tired for.
Type: Posts; User: Lino
I agree. Or even just let the teams play the full 15. It's the super bowl, there's no next week to make players tired for.
>>Atlanta deserved to lose because their offense and coaching was so bad that they blew a 25 point 2nd-half lead. You're hung up on the overtime rules? You can't possibly be serious.>>
OMG, do you...
Because I like forcing a team to drive the length of the field to win the game,>>
Great, except only one team got that opportunity! :)
Ohhh man this logic is killing me. Ok, so Atlanta deserves to lose because they couldn't stop NE in OT is apparently what folks are saying. But what if NE couldn't stop Atlanta either (had Atlanta...
Ok, maybe lets approach this a different way: what exactly is the objection to letting both offences touch the ball at least once? And why is the current system better?
Extra Innings baseball. Away team scores in top of 10th...game over. Hell if you wanna get an at bat, then pitch and play D for crissake!
I suggest for super bowl only...you play a full quarter, regardless of who scores when and how.
Ok so a championship soccer game is tied and it gos in to penalty kicks. Team that wins toss gets to go first. If they score, it's over they win, other team doesn't get a penalty kick. Sound fair?...
Superb QB. Though in my humble opinion only...3 of his wins were gifted. 1. The tuck rule. 2. Moronic Pete Carrol passing on the 1 with Lynch on your team 3. Falcons absolute stunning stupidity in...